Citigroup reaffirms its Citi Field naming sponsorship
The second item in my Tuesday newspaper column concerns the ongoing difficulties at Citigroup and how that might affect the $400-million deal to slap its name atop the Mets' new ballyard.
In it Citi reaffirms its commitment in the wake of a bailout, and its CFO admits that even if it wanted out, it has a binding contract.
This is a complex, emotional situation, as you can tell from Rieber's column and the comments in my post Monday.
I made some lame attempts in my collumn to think of government-related names for the stadium - i.e. "Tax Shack" - but readers can surely do better.
Take a stab at it if you can get your comment through our maddening filtering system. The best idea will earn WatchDog kudos.
I thought about writing a column for Tuesday about Citigroup's $20 million per year naming rights deal with the Mets, which still is in place despite 52,000 pending layoffs and now a government bailout.
This scoreboard doesn't exist anymore.
I realize this is far from an original thought, but it really is quite incredible how closely the story of the 2008 Rays matches that of the 1969 Mets.
I wrote a
Had a nice chat this morning with Dave Howard, the Mets' Grand Poobah of Business Related Stuff - and former quarterback at one of those Half Hollow Hills Highs (East, I think).