September 5, 2008

Bill Davidson on Isiah Thomas

On the eve of his induction into the Basketball Hall of Fame, Pistons owner Bill Davidson sat down for a Q&A with Mitch Albom of the Detroit Free Press. The most fascinating part of the exchange was this cryptic yet very telling explanation of the feud between Davidson and Isiah Thomas.

isiah-davidson.jpg

Q: Who's your best-ever Pistons hire?

A: I'd have to separate that between players and others.

Q: OK. Who's the best player?

A: I'd say the best player we ever drafted was Isiah Thomas.

Q: Can you say anything -- and I recognize it's been a complex relationship over the years -- about the falling out you two had at the end of his playing career?

A: Well, I was very, very close to Isiah, and there were times he was almost like a son. But, because of his background, um ... I told him he had to change -- you know, coming from where he came from. I said, "You've got it made now. Don't keep doing those things that you've been doing." I won't tell you what they are. But he couldn't change.

Q: And that's why he didn't have a future with the Pistons?

A: Right.

Q: Had he been able to change, would you have envisioned him having a lifelong career in the front office?

A: Yeah, certainly.

Q: Had you discussed that at one point with him?

A: I wouldn't go that far.

Q: But in your mind you had considered that a possibility?

A: If you know the relationship was like a son -- I was trying to counsel him -- the subject of his future relationship and what his job would be never came up. Because he had to change first.

Q: To use your metaphor -- he didn't take his father's counsel?

A: No.

Q: What's your relationship with him at this point?

A: We're the best of friends.

Q: How did it heal?

A: One day I decided -- this was about five years ago -- that there's only one guy that I'm really not friendly with. So I called Isiah up, and I said Isiah (chuckling) -- before I go to my grave -- you know, whenever I do -- I want you and I to be friends.

Q: Interesting.

A: So we hug each other now -- and you know we just had the reunion. We're the best of friends today.

Q: Why was it important to you to make peace? Did it have to do with getting older?

A: Right. As you get closer to the end, you say ... there's one exception. I want to cure that exception.

Q: And he didn't know why you were calling?

A: No. In a way he didn't understand -- never has quite understood ...

Q: What happened?

A: Right.

Q: Did you feel a need to go into all that?

A: No, no. There was no point in going into it. ...We just come from different backgrounds. He had to fight his way up, and I didn't have the problems he had growing up. There's a lot of good things about Isiah, but when we had our parting, it was over something pretty substantial.

Very interesting stuff. Is it worth calling the Knicks to see if Isiah is available for comment?

Darko would welcome deal to Knicks

Darko Milicic's agent, Marc Cornstein, wouldn't be the least bit opposed to a trade that would send his client to the Knicks and Zach Randolph to Memphis.

"If a trade were to happen to New York, Darko would be very excited to play with Coach D'Antoni," Cornstein said in a phone interview Friday. "He's an outstanding coach and has a great understanding of the European player. I also have great appreciation to Memphis and the opportunity they've given him as well. So I look at it as a win-win either way."

The deal under discussion would be Milicic and Marko Jaric -- Marko & Darko -- to the Knicks for Randolph. Other pieces could be involved on both sides.

Milicic has two years at $14.5 million left on his deal, which would be wiped off the books in time for the Knicks' stated goal of clearing cap space for a free-agent spree in the summer of 2010. Jaric would be owed $7.625 million in 2010-11, but that's almost $10 million less than Randolph is owed that year.

The scenario, confirmed by two people familiar with the discussions, has hit an impasse with the Grizzlies' desire for the Knicks' to pay some of Randolph's deferred money. It's not clear whether that snag will kill the deal. Stay tuned.


Manu's Olympic injury delays contract talks

Manu Ginobili says the ankle injury that worsened while playing for Argentina in the Olympics hasn't soured his relationship with Spurs coach Gregg Popovich, who urged him to skip the tournament. But those talks about a contract extension that began prior to the Beijing Games are on hold until further notice.

"Contract negotiations for an extension have been put off until after the surgery,” agent Herb Rudoy told the San Antonio Express-News. “The Spurs want to see how he recovers from the surgery.”

Ginobili had surgery on Wednesday and is expected to be out 2-3 months. My feeling is he was probably going to need surgery anyway, but he could've gotten it out of the way earlier in the summer if he'd skipped the Olympics -- meaning he would've been ready for the start of the regular season. Could wind up being an expensive decision for both Manu and the Spurs.

Knicks 2008-09 Preview

Here's the rundown from the guys at HoopsWorld.com. This tells you everything you need to know: Under the "Who We Like" section, there are five people listed. Only three of them are basketball players. The list includes Donnie Walsh and Mike D'Antoni.

Both could handle the rock back in the day, but if your third-best player is a 67-year-old man ...

September 4, 2008

Jamal Crawford blogs for Newsday

You've got to check out Jamal Crawford's blog. Dude has agreed to blog for Newsday this season. Honestly, what other newspaper Web site in the country has three people blogging about the NBA -- one of whom actually plays in the NBA?

Answer: Zero.

The Knicks will stink again but no one will care

Interesting analysis from the Wages of Wins blog (a favorite of mine) about lowering expectations in New York.

Check it out here.

Essentially, the point is that the Knicks aren't going to be much better this season than they were last season. The difference will be that expectations will be lower. This will be accomplished simply by replacing point guard Stephon Marbury with Chris Duhon. According to the site's wins produced statistic, the players are basically the same. But since Marbury is Starbury -- with all the false bravado that entails -- everyone thinks he's a good player. He's not any better than Duhon at producing wins, but since no one thinks Duhon is any more than an average player, no one will be disappointed when the Knicks don't win with him as the point guard.

I'll buy that, to an extent. But the post doesn't take into account two key factors: If, in fact, the Knicks toss Marbury (either through a trade or a buyout), the team could stand to win five or six more games simply due to the fact that Marbury isn't around to distract people and annoy his teammates. (That isn't statistical analysis, just my gut feeling, I'll admit.) Secondly, the analysis misses the larger plan to clear cap space and gain flexibility for future moves that will improve the team down the road. That's an important part of the plan that shouldn't be ignored simply because the on-court results will be similar this season.

Couple of interesting tidbits from the article: Only the Bobcats and Hawks have lost more games than the Knicks since 2004-05 (Isiah Thomas' first full season in New York), and the team's efficiency differential (offensive efficiency minus defensive efficiency) of -6.9 was the franchise's worst mark since Wages of Wins began tracking the stat in 1973-74.

Also, WOW links to this analysis by Eric Doerr of DraftExpress.com, who predicts that Danilo Gallinari will be a fair approximation of Andrea Bargnani -- whom he states was the least productive player in the NBA last season with -5.7 wins produced.

So if I'm right about no Marbury meaning six more wins, and Doerr is right about Gallinari, the Knicks will win 23 games again this season. Enjoy!

Thunderstruck (UPDATE 2)

In case you missed it -- and in the unlikely event that you care -- the Oklahoma City team has a name: Thunder. Here is the official Web site.

Just what Newsday needs. Another lame, singular team name to lump in with Heat and Magic, thus further highlighting the fact that our journalistic style on singular team names is incorrect.

A collective noun, even if it has a singular name, should take a plural verb. As in, "The Magic are among the favorites to win the Southeast Division." Newsday style insists that I write, "The Magic is among the favorites to win the Southeast Division." That doesn't make any sense. The Knicks are ... the Nets are ... the Thunder, Heat, or Magic are ...

AP_HEADER_2008.jpg
If you want proof, see the entry on the Minnesota Wild from the AP Stylebook FAQ.

There, I feel better now. Allow me to congratulate myself for producing the most obscure blog entry in blogging history.

Updated 12:18 p.m. The guys at SLAM don't like the nickname at all, and the headline on their entry brings up another reason not to like it. The second syllable in Thunderstruck rhymes with a four-letter word that means "stink" and could lead to some unfortunate chanting by fans if the Thunder aren't very good.

Updated 3:52 p.m. Check out the online poll at InsideHoops.com, where only 19 percent love or like the nickname and 41 percent hate the logo.

Search NBA Insider

Recent Posts

Categories

Basketball Video

Archives