Good morning, Fixers. Have we reached the saturation point with coaching candidates? Scott Skiles is off the table. Herb Williams had his chance to gauge his chances. Patrick Ewing hasn't been contacted and Jeff Van Gundy isn't interested.
Mark Jackson is the front runner of a one-man race. And he has yet to have a formal sit-down with Donnie Walsh, though, you would expect, that is a mere formality.
So in the meantime let's get to some unfinished business, the roster. Instead of doing the usual report card -- let's assume a 23-win team is loaded with F's -- we should decide the keepers and the dumpees going into 2008-09. We'll deal with this in real-world logic, so contract status counts as much as usefulness.
JAMAL CRAWFORD (career-high 20.6 ppg) -- Likable team guy has endured several coaching changes and played in a backcourt with the unpredictable Stephon Marbury. I'd like to see him in a stable situation, with a playmaking PG and a coach who turns that green light to yellow. Still plenty of upside for him and an opt-out coming next summer. He's a one-dimensional player, but it's a hell of a dimension to have. He's athletic and smart enough to be a better defender, which is that one element missing. KEEP
ZACH RANDOLPH (averaged a double-double) -- I've said from the start that he initially appeared to be all-in, but then started getting-his when stuff hit the fan in November. His defense and passing are troubling, but he did prove he can stay out of off-the-court trouble, which is a step in the right direction. Despite his contract the Knicks did have some interested teams at the deadline and they should revisit. I like Zach and would love to believe him when he said he plans on coming back next year in the best shape of his life. I want to believe it, but I don't know if I can afford to if I'm the GM. DUMP
STEPHON MARBURY (appeared in just 24 games) -- His time with the Knicks has been a train-wreck, but don't one of you say you've known all along he'd be a bust as a Knick. When Isiah first brought him in, it was the prodigal son's return. Now he's New York's basketball orphan. Like Zach, you'd love to believe he'll come back in shape both mentally and physically, but that ship's sailed. One year with $22 mil, you're not moving him until the deadline, at best, and you'll probably have to take on bad contracts. So the best bet here is a buyout and an adieu (or is it, Ciao?). Air out the room and let another PG give it a go. DUMP
EDDY CURRY (played just 25 mins per game) -- His weaknesses are correctable and it has nothing to do with the fact that the NBA isn't a big-man's game. Curry has uncanny athleticism for a man his size and he is damn coachable. As one coach said to me, "Some guys are lazy and some are just not good self-starters. Eddy is not lazy." I agree. But someone needs to get on his big butt and keep him accountable. Zach's presence made Eddy shrink a little and that's telling of Eddy's personality. He's not a lead dog, which is what Isiah tried to make him, but Eddy is definitely someone you can develop. He needs to work on his explosion, period. Confidence comes with knowing you are in great shape. Eddy lost confidence this season because he knew he wasn't. KEEP
NATE ROBINSON (scoring average improved third straight season) -- We pushed for him to get an opportunity to prove himself as the PG of the future and we'll admit at this point that perhaps he is built to be what he is right now: energy and offense off the bench. Confidence is critical with N8 and you can't mistake cockiness for confidence. You have to take into account that he has not been properly developed, but whomever gets to coach him next season needs to figure out how to get him to play like he did last July in the summer league. He was mostly under control, very confident and very unselfish. Oh, and he played defense. N8 should follow the likes of Barbosa, et al and soon will become a Sixth Man candidate. KEEP
DAVID LEE (14.7 rebs per 48 mins) -- D-Lee admitted to me that he didn't feel 100 percent until about January, which was a result of that leg injury at the end of last season and a very busy offseason that included workouts with the USA Basketball Development team. He started to get his bounce back in the second half of the season and his numbers improved dramatically. He also developed a go-to move on offense (inside pivot, jab-step) and started hitting a mid-range jumper with more consistency. We know he can rebound and with his pogo-stick legs, he'll go back to being a double-figure board man. Next year is about knocking down shots and proving he can slide into the four spot as a starter. Defense on the post is his next challenge. With those legs and maybe 10-to-15 lbs of bulk, he should be able to challenge more. KEEP
QUENTIN RICHARDSON (shot 32.2 % 3PT) -- Back surgery had an impact on his offseason conditioning and he never really got it going. The team's internal turmoil had something to do with it as well. Q-Rich is old for a 28 year old and his days as a starter might be over, but he could still be an effective player off the bench as a shooter and defender. Of course he's got to accept that role willingly. He's a difficult player to move, so you have to get him to buy-in. He has an influence in the locker room and in the right setting can be a leader. KEEP
FRED JONES (2:1 assists:turnovers) -- Will be a free agent and is not expected to be resigned. Made the most of the heavy minutes Isiah gave him late in the season, perhaps as a way to get scouts to see him so he'll have some opportunities next season. Overall good guy who was a surprisingly reliable three-point shooter. DUMP
WILSON CHANDLER (18 ppg, 7.7 rebs in last four games) -- How do you judge a rookie when he gets major minutes in what is otherwise considered garbage time in a lost season? Before his knee injury in the second-to-last game of the season, Will started playing with a great deal of confidence. He proved he has a shooting touch and isn't afraid to get to the rim. He also took on defensive challenges. Explosiveness makes him a good help defender, but he noticably lost his legs as he started getting major minutes. Off-season conditioning is critical because if he shows up in great shape and plays with confidence, he'll push for the starting small forward spot. KEEP
JARED JEFFRIES (39.9 FG%) -- Isiah brought him in but then didn't know how to use him. Jeffries is a smart player who reads plays well but doesn't always execute properly. Isiah had him on the perimeter as a ball-mover, but that made it easy to double off him, because of his poor shooting. Jeffries has to be a slasher and cutter and, occasionally, you can post him up. With his size, length and athleticism, he has to be a better defender than he's shown, but that might be a result of how he was used. Jared should be a dynamic help defender in the paint. With so many forwards, I'm not sure he has a role here. I like the guy personally and enjoyed chatting with him about basketball and life. With three years left on his contract, he might be tough to move, but you have to investigate it. DUMP
MALIK ROSE (16.6 pts, 10.0 reb per 48 mins) -- The locker room godfather, who is good to have around to counsel young players and veterans and set an example. But for selfish reasons, he's an expiring contract that you keep around to the very end and let him melt off the cap. Then, if he calls it a career, you bring him into the organization either on the broadcast side or in basketball operations. Smart dude with rings. You can't have enough people like that in an organization. KEEP
RENALDO BALKMAN (43.2 FT%) -- A year ago you could see potential and, perhaps what Isiah was thinking when he drafted him with a first-round pick. After the summer league you got an idea of what type of role (defensive stopper) he could serve off the bench as another energy, up-tempo player. Then you saw him this season and he looked like one of those guys you'd only remember five years from now as "the guy with the dreds". Balkman is yet another Knicks youngster who has not been properly developed or mentored. Let's say this gently: Rey is not a guy you can just leave to figure it out on his own and trust he'll get it right. He's a guy who needs constant discipline and direction. The question for Donnie Walsh to ask himself would be is Balkman worth the effort? With Chandler emerging, Lee showing he can be versatile and Jeffries and Richardson on the roster, where does Balkman fit? Perhaps you need to see him in a stable, controlled environment with rules and regulations (not to mention defined roles). KEEP
MARDY COLLINS (36.2 FG %) -- Had an impressive end to last season but knee surgery in May had a negative impact on his offseason. The knee was not 100 percent in training camp and then Isiah was yo-yoing him in and out of the lineup during the Marbury drama. Some guys told me Mardy started to slip to the "dark side" for a while this season and that's a trend Collins can ill-afford. The obvious issues with his game involve his shooting, but the defense he showed a year ago was missing this season. He doesn't run an offense with the conviction of a floor general. If the Knicks pick a PG in the draft, it might mean the end for Collins. DUMP
RANDOLPH MORRIS (37 rebs, 37 fouls in 18 GP) -- Isiah kept him hidden for most of the season and when he finally let him play, we saw why. Randy shows decent footwork and good post-up moves, but he's slow both in movement and explosion. Lack of playing dulled his reaction time, which had a lot to do with it, but clearly this young guy should have spent the year in the D-League. It was a waste of a year for him and might cost him money because he'll likely wind up in the D-League next season hoping to attract an NBA team's attention. DUMP
JEROME JAMES (2 GP) -- If there were ever a candidate for the Disabled Player Exemption, Jerome's case is it. He clearly can't keep himself healthy and that knee is the issue. Otherwise, I'd try to sue him for breach of contract because he showed up out of shape for two straight training camps. Just keeping him on the roster is symbolic of the past regime's lack of discipline and accountability. DUMP
* *
OK, so that's eight keeps (Crawford, Cury, Robinson, Lee, Richardson, Chandler, Rose and Balkman) and seven dumps (Randolph, Marbury, Jones, Jeffries, Collins, Morris and James). Obviously some of these DUMPs will result in cap hits from buyouts or will bring in equal dollars via trades, so you can't view it as saving money or opening up roster spaces. With some of the dumps, it might not be feasible to move the player (Randolph or Jeffries, for instance) so the DUMP may have to wind up being a KEEP, depending on the market.