The Knicks Fix

Just another day in the life, Fixers. As one NBA executive said to me yesterday, "Got to be weird to cover things over there, huh?"

Weird? I love weird. I live for it. This stuff just follows me around. I mean, look at how ordinary the Islanders have become since I left that beat! They're just a regular franchise now, run well and respected and going about their business. During my time there? Absolute chaos on a daily basis.

And I loved it. Never a dull moment.

The Knicks were already a disaster when I got here, but man my arrival was like the nor'easter that met the tropical depression. I'm like the dude on the Weather Channel in the rain slicker tethered to a lamp post while I'm filming my report in gale force winds.

Squalls up to 50 feet! Squalls, I tell ya! And this is only the beginning! This is awesome! Back to you in the studio, Alexandra and, may I add, looking good as usual.

As I was saying, today was just a typical day:

In the media workroom at the MSG Training Center this morning, a group of reporters stood around the TV watching ESPN and awaiting the Jeremy Schaap interview with David Stern with tape recorders aimed at the speaker. One reporter joked that the minute the segment would come on, the Knicks PR guy would open the door to invite us in to watch practice.

Sure enough.

It couldn't have been coincidence, could it?

Regardless, we remained glued to the TV to hear Stern's comments about the Knicks. The Commish had been rather gentle in his public thoughts about the ugly sexual harassment trial and all of the lurid events that came with it. He took some heat for it and clearly he decided to offer a glove-slap on the day the NBA season opened. Schaap asked Stern about the tarnished image of the Knicks franchise coming out of the trial and what it meant. Stern pulled back the arrow and let it fly.

“It demonstrates that they’re not a model of intelligent management," Stern said.

Bulls eye.

Not the first time Stern has had to publicly reprimand the Knicks organization (which makes you wonder how many times he's done it in private).

Click the Knicks page link to see my story for Wednesday's paper for the full report, including Isiah Thomas' take and what this lingering black cloud could mean for everyone involved.

And yet all I can do is sing....(this one goes out to my seating chart neighbor, Ho-Beck):

Offer me solutions, offer me alternatives
and I decline.

It's the end of the world as we know it.
It's the end of the world as we know it.
It's the end of the world as we know it and I feel fine.

* *

The Knicks' opening night opponent, the Cleveland Cavaliers, inked one of their two holdout free agents, according to the Akron Beacon Journal. Sasha Pavlovic signed a three-year deal for about $4 million to $5 million per. He's missed all of training camp, however, so it remains to be seen if he'll be ready for Friday's game. But he will be in uniform.

The Cavs are still without Anderson Varejao and the Beacon Journal says he and the team are still far apart in negotiations. You can bet Eddy Curry welcomes this news. Last season Curry was often frustrated by Sideshow Bob's active defense (not to mention his penchant for flopping). Maybe it's just a hair thing, but I'm gonna miss the opportunity to see Varejao and Renaldo Balkman battle for a rebound.

Cleveland was reportedly interested in bringing in Juwan Howard (who was released by the T-Wolves), but it sounds more like Juwan will wind up in Dallas.

As some of you have noted, the Cavaliers did add someone we all know well: rookie Demetris Nichols. We knew he'd land on his feet somewhere in the NBA. How fitting he lands with the team the Knicks play first. Let's see if he gets any floor time, but good for D-Nick.

* *

Speaking of people we knew well....

Did you all see that Stevie Francis is already grumbling in Houston? Seems he's not in the guard-heavy Rockets' rotation and that has The Franchise upset. Rick Adelman said he had planned for Francis to be a starter, but didn't come to camp in the best condition.

Wonder where the Rockets will send Steve for his "rehab" stint for that knee problem he tends to have when he's not playing and coaches don't want him infecting their bench during games?

* *

The Kobe Bryant stuff will dominate the NBA news as the first week of the season gets underway. We know Chicago is in play, but who's on deck? Ernie Grunfeld shot down a rumor that the Wizards would offer Gilbert Arenas. Mark Cuban isn't going to give up Dirk Nowitzki, but would love to have him come play with him. Phoenix? I thought the owners there were looking to save money, not spend it. Would Kobe agree to come to the Nets and play with Jason Kidd? Maybe if there was a shovel in the ground in Brooklyn. But until that day comes, no one really believes they're ever going to leave the swampland oblivion.

Some people -- my boy Ken Berger included (and I have much respect for K-Berg) -- won't let go of the notion that the Knicks are still in the running. Fixers, I urge you to move along.

Isiah Thomas, who in May at the Orlando Pre-Draft camp spoke giddily when Kobe made his initial trade request, refuses to talk about it, even a little. Even with a smile. A hint of something, a gleam in his eye.

Not this:

“You have to ask the Lakers . . . It’s happening in their house with their player. They’ll speak and talk about their player.”

Or this:

“We never comment on anything like that. The Lakers speak for their players.”

Knowing Isiah, there's no way he'd be this low-key if he felt he was in on something. Berger reported this a while back, but there was indication that Kobe wants nothing to do with the Big Apple Circus the Knicks have become.

Of course the Ron Artest trade rumors have resurfaced now that Mike Bibby is out for a while and the Sacramento Kings appear to be headed for a major makeover . . .

Isiah Thomas rarely calls out a player by name, let alone two. So it caught my attention last Friday after the preseason finale loss to the Nets when he said Stephon Marbury and Jamal Crawford “are better players than what we have seen in the exhibition.”

It sort of got overshadowed by the C. Vivian Stringer stuff over the weekend, but Monday at practice Isiah was reminded of his comments about his starting backcourt. And he noticably backtracked.

“It was strictly based on shooting," he said. "I thought defensively and everything else they were good, but the preseason’s over and they’ll be ready. They’re pros, been in this league a long time. They know how to turn it on.”

Wait, did he just say defensively?

Maybe things are worse than I thought.

* *

Renaldo Balkman, who missed all of the preseason with that "stress reaction" in his ankle, finally participated in his first full practice on Monday and Isiah expects him to be ready for the opener in Cleveland on Friday. It'll be interesting to see if Thomas tries Balkman against LeBron James when Quentin Richardson, who usually defends LBJ well, goes to the bench. Balkman seemed to relish playing a stopper role in the Las Vegas summer league last July. But can he do it against an all-star?

* *

Countdown to the Season Opener. I'm looking for signs of life among Knicks fans, especially with the Yankees dominating the sports airwaves and the Jets and Giants pulling up the rear.

So this is some kid Roy, who posted this video of himself (and four of the Knicks starting five) on YouTube.

Here's your Andy Warhol moment, Roy. Gotta love when he sings, "Go New York, Go New York, Go!"

I scheduled my off days for this weekend so I was not present for Isiah's emotional chat with the media following Saturday's practice. Newsday's Anthony Rieber was there in my place and filed this report for Sunday's print edition. C. Vivian Stringer apologized to Isiah for her criticism of what he said in his video deposition for the sexual harassment trial.

I know most of you would prefer to talk basketball here, especially with the season opening in five days. Ken Berger and I did a full preview of the Knicks and NBA season in Sunday's Newsday. Check it out and let me hear what you think.

Judging from his conversation with reporters after Saturday'a practice, not to mention his uncharacteristically sullen mood lately, you can't not notice that Isiah is clearly wearing down from the continued fallout of this trial.

But it seems not as much from the jury decision against him as his comments in that deposition. He and James Dolan -- sure is interesting how Jimmy D has yet to show any real public support for his coach -- can appeal the jury decision, but there's nothing Thomas can do about the court of public opinion other than continue to explain himself.

Watch the 11-minute deposition played for the jury here (Please be advised it is unedited, so there is some strong language) and see for yourself. These 11 minutes were edited from about seven hours of full deposition. The 11 minutes were used in court as the most important of the deposition. There was one juror caught sleeping during the trial, so you can imagine the snoring that would be going on if they had to sit through the entire seven hours.

What is fact is that this tape was edited by Anucha Browne Sanders' lawyers and presented to the court at the trial. What is also fact is that the MSG lawyers had the right to object to the video, but didn't.

The lawyer who interviewed Isiah in this video asked him about a Garden executive, Frank Murphy, who is a white male, about an incident when Browne Sanders says Murphy called her a "bitch." Thomas was asked if that violated an employee code of conduct.

"Let me put it to you this way, that would have violated my code of conduct, OK?" Thomas replies.

Then after a pause, Isiah adds, "And, maybe I’m not supposed to go there, but I’m going to go there anyway, a white man calling a black female ‘that,’ it’s on with me too. I’m not tolerating that, I’m not accepting that. So if it's going down that road, with a black female and a white male saying that to her, that's a problem for me. Screw this conduct thing.”

The clip ends there and jumps about 42 minutes ahead (there is a clock in the bottom right corner) in the interview (Fact: we don't know if this was a break in the deposition or if the interview continued in another direction).

The lawyer says, "You stated earlier that you found it offensive for a white man to call a black woman a bitch. Do you remember that testimony?"

Isiah (nodding): "Mm-hm."

Lawyer: "Please say 'Yes.'"

Isiah: "Yes."

Lawyer: "Would you find it also offensive for a black man to call a black woman a bitch?"

Isiah pauses a minute, gestures with his hand as if he's considering the differences in his mind before he offers, “Not as much, no, and I’m sorry to say, I do make a distinction.”

Lawyer: "But if I'm correct from your earlier testimony, a male calling a woman a bitch you find to be offensive?"

Isiah: "Most definitely."

Lawyer: "Black or white?"

Isiah: "Black or white. But, a white male calling a black female a bitch is highly offensive to me.”

The interview moves on to Thomas' relationship with Browne Sanders. It's actually almost comical to hear Thomas seriously discuss the usage issues of the word "bitch" in one breath and then hear the lawyer abruptly ask, "Mr. Thomas, do you find Ms. Sanders attractive?"

But that is the extend of the comment that made headlines. You can see that by removing the comment from it's context, the statement "Not as much, no" in response to whether or not he found it offensive for a black man to call a black woman a bitch is condemnable. But within the context of the conversation -- knowing the point Isiah was going out of his way to make -- you eventually see that he does acknowledge that black or white, the use of the word toward the woman is offensive.

What he revealed was, in his mind, there are varying degrees, depending on race, which is also an issue. Thomas has since explained that his statement about the higher sensitivity of a white man calling a black woman a "bitch" has to do with the racial undertones of it.

Isiah reveals that he does see the word in different colors. This notion that we're all the same and should be viewed the same is misguided from a socialogical standpoint. That doesn't mean we can accept, appreciate and respect our differences. It also doesn't mean we shouldn't be treated the same.

But we can't expect to be viewed the same.

Fact is, Isiah never said it was not offensive for a black man to call a black woman a bitch, he said it was more offensive to him for a white man to do it. But the deposition clearly states that he acknowledged it was offensive, black or white. Period.

He created this headache for himself by deciding to go there in the deposition. He is free to speak his mind, but others are also free to criticize him for it. As long as they have all of the facts.

Not the best way to close out the preseason.

- A blowout loss to the Nets.

- An injury to a player (Jared Jeffries, knee sprain) expected to be in the rotation

- Rare public criticism from Isiah Thomas on his starting backcourt of Stephon Marbury and Jamal Crawford.

* *

a href="http://weblogs.newsday.com/sports/basketball/knicks/blog/act_jared_jeffries.jpg">Let's start with the injury.

Jeffries sprained his right knee after he picked off a downcourt pass from Jason Kidd to Richard Jefferson. He went to the floor in obvious pain after he landed awkwardly. Jeffries had ACL surgery on the knee a few years ago, so there was some initial concern it could be worse.

It wasn't. An MRI revealed it was only a sprain. Jeffries will be re-evaluated in two weeks so you can pretty much eliminate him from the season opener in Cleveland next Friday. There's one less guy to guard LeBron James.

* *

The game was ugly from the start for the Knicks, who never seemed to get their offense untracked and when they did get open looks just couldn't get shots to consistently fall. The Knicks shot 31 for 84 from the floor (36.9 percent) and an awful 5 for 21 from three-point range (23.8).

Thomas seemed particularly concerned about Marbury and Crawford, whom he called out specifically when discussing the preseason after the game. They shot a combined 4 for 19 in the game, but did have 5 assists each and only one turnover (Crawford) and four steals (three by Marbury) between them.

"For Crawford and Marbury, this is their exhibition season," Thomas said. "We're hoping we see two different guys."

I asked Isiah to elaborate on it because in the game it was hard not to notice Zach Randolph's frustration several times when shots were going up from the perimeter and the ball wasn't finding the post as often as it should.

"I know they are better players than what we have seen in the exhibition," Isiah said. "A lot of the focus has been putting the ball inside, but we definitely need a healthy compliment from our guards to be considered a dangerous team."

Thomas' words were presented to Crawford, who said he had heard the same from Thomas, but seemed surprised it was publicized.

“One thing about coach is he’ll always talk to you before you hear about it from the media,” Crawford said, “and we appreciate that.”

* *

Quick programming note: please see my daily story on Newsday.com regarding C. Vivian Stringer's comments about Isiah and Isiah's response to her.

* *

As for the 4-3 preseason record and going out with a blowout loss, Crawford didn't put much emphasis on it. "You can't read too much into it," he said. "The Cavs went to the Finals last year and in the preseason they were 1-5."

The season opens next Friday in Cleveland and Zach Randolph feels that is a perfect place to start.

"We've got to see how we match up against the best," he said.

The last of the pretend games, finally. Six is too many, especially when the sixth comes on a rainy Friday night when traffic is so snarled everyone is late. Eddy Curry arrived barely an hour before gametime. Zach Randolph just got here. Z-Bo got his first taste of real New York traffic.

But the good news for Curry is he can finally stop wearing that shoulder-resistance contraption tomorrow. Not tonight now. But tomorrow.

Quentin Richardson is out, but Thomas says it's not because of the mildly sprained ankle. "This is me holding him out," Thomas said.

This is me offering up the starting lineups:

Starting Lineups

KNICKS (4-2)
Marbury
Crawford
Jeffries
Randolph
Curry

NETS (3-2)
Kidd
Carter
Jefferson
Collins
Krstic

* - Renaldo Balkman is dressed but he's not playing. Rey just wanted to wear the gear. Aw man, crazy.

* *

Tomorrow at CCNY the Knicks D-League affiliate, the Tulsa 66ers, are holding open tryouts. If anyone had aspirations, you should know the deadline for registration passed and it would have cost you a non-refundable $150 to get in the gym.

The Knicks share this affiliation, but word is they are planning to have their own full affiliate D-League team next season. Remember our discussion from the summer? I think Long Island would be a great location.

Also part of that discussion was my frustration with the rule that if you send a player to the D-League, it costs you a spot on your 15-man NBA roster. That hampers a team's ability to develop young players who may not be ready for the NBA and teach them their system (i.e.: Demetris Nichols, Jared Jordan). Right now, teams look to hide players in Europe for a year.

I was talking with someone from the D-League last week and he told me that rule is likely to change in the next collective bargaining agreement. The NBA wants to have all of the teams aligned with their own affiliates first.

Have a great weekend.

ESPN Radio's Brandon Tierney spent the day pouring through your mailbag questions and sent me his responses. Keep in mind some of the replies were before the news of Demetris Nichols being cut by the Knicks today.

I want to thank BT for his interest in doing this and for promoting the Knicks Fix blog on his show. The Nation is growing.

Here's the mailbag...

----------------------------

Posted by lukberger | October 23, 2007 15:02

When it comes to the Knicks BT is the only one on the radio worth listening to.( other than Max Kellerman)
Would the Knicks be better served having Craw come off the bench or does his ability to score in bunches and his chemistry with Curry make up for his defensive deficiencies?
I think the starting five should be Steph,Q, Balk, Zach, and Curry.
Nate, Craw and Lee off the bench. Sometimes even Jeffries because of his contributions on the defensive end and his ability to defend multiple positions. He did lead a team to the NCAA Championship Game. Im not ready to give up on him yet.
What are your feelings on the starting five and rotation?

BT: lukberger, nice job in the leadoff spot, appreciate the support. Personally, I feel strongly that Crawford has earned the right to start, and given his chemistry with Curry, I like him on the floor from the opening tip. Given Randolph's offensive role, the front court needs time to blend, and with Jamal there, it increases the chances that Curry gets a few easy looks, and gets into a groove early. For me, Quentin (along with Crawford) keeps the defense honest, and he's by far one of the better defensive players on the team. My starting five: Marbury, Crawford, Richardson, Randolph and Curry. As for Balkman, I'm a fan...but he hasn't even practiced full-tilt this pre-season. You better read this blog more frequently!!! Still, he'll be a factor this season, and rip down a few rims in the process.

====================================================================

Posted by Jim G | October 23, 2007 15:11
Brandon - I am a Marist graduate (1989), as I know you are. Do you think Jared Jordan will get a roster spot and will be make an impact inthe NBA within the next 5 years? Thanks.

BT: Jim, once a Red Fox, always a Red Fox. Have you seen pictures of the new football stadium? Pretty sweet. As for Jared, given the volume of guaranteed deals, it's going to be tough for him to stick--now. I know Isiah has liked him for some time, extending back to early last season when he was in college. He needs to work on his body. Once he does, he has a chance, and that should absolutely come within 2 years, not five. Whether he suits up for the Knicks or someone else, he will see a regular season NBA roster at some point. It's like a pitcher who throws strikes. Jared simply delivers the basketball as well as any college player I've seen firsthand, in over a decade. He has a chance. And of course, I'm rooting for the kid. I had a solid 15-20 minute conversation with a Knick coach prior to the Philly game, and it was quite the endorsement. Ask Hahn, he was right next to me. (Editor's note: Sorry, I was watching the dance team warm up at the time and wasn't paying attention).

====================================================================

Posted by jwambera | October 23, 2007 15:28
Brandon Do you think Chandler will be in the rotation this year? What in your opinion is his long term upside?

BT: jwambera, Chandler is intriguing, for sure. He already has a pro build, and should grow into a devastating finisher at some point. Still, there are a lot of bodies (and contracts) in front of him, but Isiah has always done a pretty good job of keeping young prospects involved just enough. It will be a slow process, but the kid has every physical tool (minus the "J") that anyone can ask for. I saw him a lot at DePaul, and I always liked him. His coach, Jerry Wainright actually told me on air that Wilson is the kind of kid he would want his daughter to date. Is there any higher praise? (Editor's note: Um...how about "He's the kind of kid I would want my daughter to date once he signs that multi-million dollar contract")

=====================================================================

Posted by bucktooth | October 23, 2007 15:38
i feel like nichols is getting his comeuppance, after refusing to go to europe for the year. might be petty but hey.

BT: Bucktooth, I disagree with your assertion. Remember, players that can help a coach win stick around, others do not. In his case, he has a two-way battle on his hands. One is that he's just not quite ready for a defined role AND... all of the contracts. I'll say this: I called a few of his games the past few seasons when the Orange played St. John's, and his performance last year at the Dome dwarfed any other I've seen/called since I've been in the business. He dropped (38?) and hit every shot imaginable. Runners, threes, fallways...not an easy hoop in the group, it was insane. He'll play somewhere, and I'd like to see it work out here. He can stroke it.

=====================================================================

Posted by Pete | October 23, 2007 15:39
When has Isiah or Dolan done the "right" thing?

BT: Pete, I'm not here to defend anyone's body of work, but rather look ahead to the season. After a while, wins/losses paint a pretty clear picture, no? Let's see. This team has talent, let's see if they've acquired that elusive winning "gene." They're knocking.

=====================================================================

Posted by Nas | October 23, 2007 15:45
Thank God for BT!!!!You make my 2 hour evening commute go by fast, especially around basketball season. What do you think our chances are of sneaking into the last couple spots of the playoffs? Do you think they will ever get rid of Jerome this season?

BT: High praise, thanks Nas (I prefer old Snoop and Dre myself) There's no question, the playoffs are THE goal, minimum. I encourage you to study the Knicks' roster, along with the rest of the teams in the NBA. What's truly missing? Playoff experience. Other than that, the Knicks have talent and plenty of depth. They rebound the ball well, and they get to the stripe with great frequency. You know the drill: stay healthy, and play a speck of "D" and this team is in the playoffs. Period.

=====================================================================

Posted by Jon | October 23, 2007 15:47
BT (or Alan),
Can anyone get the name/information of Clyde's Bed and Breakfast in St. Croix? The future-wife and I have been hunting for this info for years now. She agreed to get married there if Clyde did the ceremony.

BT: Jon, I'm honestly not sure, but I'll ask Clyde next time I see him, or I'm sure Hahn will do some digging for you. Hope you make some good coin bro. Good luck flying everyone out for the wedding! (Editor's note: Only radio guys make the kind of bread where you can vacation in St. Croix. We poor sportswriters can barely afford to vacation in St. Albans).

=====================================================================

Posted by Across the Hudson | October 23, 2007 15:52
What do you think of Isiah tinkering so significantly with the lineup during preseason? I've heard a lot of people say that he is trying to see different looks, figure out who's going to play defense, etc. But shouldn't the preseason be a time when a team develops chemistry within the likely units?
It would be one thing if this team was a group of veterans that has played together for years and knows each others' game inside and out. But that's obviously not the case. Why waste time figuring out what Jared Jeffries can give you with the first unit if he's not even going to play with them?
Or, is the rotation really that much in the air? I feel like one of the biggest problems with this team in recent years has been a lack of cohesion, too many turnovers, ill-advised shot attempts, and everything else that comes with a team that is trying to gel, dating back to the Larry Brown regime and his insistence on starting a different 5 every game.
Given these problems, wouldn't it make sense to see a more consistent rotation in the preseason?
One last question: Do you think Isiah might actually draw up a play or two for last second shots this season, or do you think he will continue to let Crawford run down the game clock to 3 seconds before throwing up an ill-advised, off-balance, double-covered 3?
All this being said, I am optimistic about the Knicks' chances this year. Since this is my first post on the Fix I don't want everyone to think I'm some sort of hater. I like the talent level on the team, and I really think we have a chance to surprise some people this season. I just hope that we're able to maximize that talent. I have my micro-package tickets and I'm ready to see some ball at the Garden this year.
"And if your defense makes a mistake, then BAM!, Ewing dunks in your face!"

BT: Across the Hudson, welcome, but you need to be schooled on Rule # 1 in Blog-ville: Quit apologizing for your take. Stick with your position, this world feasts on the meek! LOL. I do see your point, regarding the distribution of minutes. Look at it this way: one, I think Isiah's trying to create a competitive atmosphere, and by dangling the carrot of PT, players usually respond at this level. No one, regardless of how much money they make, wants to sit. Also, he's obviously trying to find combos that work best, and perhaps create a little buzz on the trade front. Personally, I would have liked to see more of Eddie/Zach, but Curry was saddled with fouls early. This team has so much depth, it's an asset if used properly. If not, it can become a detriment, with guys unhappy. The time to figure this out obviously is now, when it doesn't count and you have a built in margin for error.

=====================================================================

Posted by stevek | October 23, 2007 16:04
Brandon,
Can the Knicks sue, not pay or fire Jerome James, Just like they did Larry Brown, and others for breach of contract for coming every year to camp out of shape? Are there any rules/repercussions in the NBA preventing a player after signing a quarantee contract, from not getting into shape, not taking care of themselves physically or gaining weight? And lets say those things lead to an injury.. Honestly what protection does an NBA team have for these kinds of players, beside cutting them and having their salaries count towards the salary cap? Thanks...

BT: stevek, I understand the frustration, but unfortunately, the options are few and far between. They can buy him out (still counts against cap), dress him (if heathy) and hope he brings something to the table--like 6 fouls when you play Shaq--or put him on the injured list. There really is no protection, which is why you always hear people mention..."sure, but Player X did so and so in a contract year..." It's the risk you run, you just hope the players you sign have enough self-respect, and respect for their craft and team, that they take care of their bodies. Not everyone does. That's just the reality for some pro athletes, and really, people in general. Not everyone gets after it and looks to improve daily.

=====================================================================

Posted by Adam | October 23, 2007 16:08
Do you see having Curry and Crawford on the floor at the same time as a problem? Both are turnover prone, neither can play much defense, and both have a low basketball IQ. Shouldn't the offense run through Randolf?

BT: Actually Adam, from what I saw last season, not having Crawford on the floor with Curry was the problem, not the other way around. Curry's numbers dipped when Jamal went down. Will Isiah have to live with some questionable shot selection and subpar defense when they play together? Probably. But you can also get 60 points combined from them on any given night. I agree though, from the post, it will--and should--run through Zach.

=====================================================================

Posted by Mark | October 23, 2007 16:35
At least he's not Colin Cowdung or Mike "Sexual Harassment" Tirico.
Even better, he's not Skip Bayless or Stephen A. (Is for Flaming) Smith.
Or Mikey "Perpetual Victim" Greenberg or Stuart "Shakur" Scott.

BT: Let me stay off this dude's Hit List. Hahn, you got my back, right? LOL Easy...that's my family you're knockin! (Editor's Note: This blog was not compensated in any way by ESPN, ESPN Radio or the Disney Corporation. Boo-ya).

====================================================================

Posted by Legend | October 23, 2007 17:02
Will the Garden crowd ever forgive Isiah Thomas or will we have to listen to the boo-birds all year long? It gives the knicks a disadvantage, as I watched the game I felt that the fans were waiting to boo the knicks.
Also , why does the New York Media hate Isiah so much?, is he the worst GM we ever had , is he a closet Tyrant.
Why is the media as a whole, so anti NYC? Regarding all our teams , football, baseball, and basketball.

BT: Legend, do you live in New York? If so, you should know the drill. Winning makes every foul stench--or fractured relationship--better. It's always been that way in this city--or in most cities with a heavy concentration of professional teams. Name one winning team or highly-productive player given a raw deal from the fans to the point of it becoming a distraction. Good luck, you'll be thinking for quite some time. There aren't many. Play hard, keep your nose clean away from the court/field, and win...and people will embrace you. Times change--that remains the same.

=====================================================================

Posted by Will Hanza | October 23, 2007 17:36
main reason you don't cut Nichols right now: What if there is an injury?
but I am sure some of this is payback because the Knicks drafted him with the understanding that he would accept being shipped off to Europe for a year to hone his skills.
Then he renegged on that, hired a new agent, etc.
He tried a power play on the Knicks, and Isiah is now returning that dis-favor.
Who knows, maybe he'll make the team somehow (trade, injury, etc).

BT: Will, I'm as intrigued with Nichols' skill-set as you are...Personally, I'm finding solutions to keep him, and not ways to show him the door. Still, be careful. I think fans sometimes are too quick to annoint a rookie the "next so and so." Remember Mike Sweetney? Let's see where this takes us, and remember: there are about 15 more important factors that will have an influence on this season, not so much the kid from 'Cuse--not yet.

=====================================================================

Posted by Todd | October 23, 2007 17:43
BT: The main problem that I see is that the roster duplicates its strengths and weaknesses. As much as I love David Lee, is there an option out there that might be available through a trade that could bring a shot blocking/rebounding beast to back up the front line as opposed to Lee, who brings energy and rebounding, but like Randolph and Curry, little D.

BT: Todd, pretty astute point on your part, in terms of identifying similar strengths within the team, and whether or not they need to diversify the roster at some point. It's quite possible they do, and not improbable that they WILL. When? Who knows. The NBA is all about matchups, and this year, the Knicks will force many teams into uncomfortable positions. For example, against small teams, the Knicks will bludgeon them to death on the blocks with the Big Boys. Against an older, or slower team, we'll see more of the 2nd unit, with an emphasis on running the floor, and maybe even picking things up 94 feet on defense in spurts. The Knicks will always get to the FT line. Are they vulnerable in certain spots, like teams with great transition skills on offense, or range from behind the arc? Yes. It's all about hitting the right buttons and forcing your opponent into an element they are uncomfortable in. That's what consumes and drives every coach, in every sport. At least the good ones.

=====================================================================

Posted by rush | October 23, 2007 19:42
BT my man! You do great radio show. Keep doing it! All the best.

BT: Rush, I'm sure after a while it seems corny, or contrived, but seriously...thank you. It's all about connecting with my audience. It's like a comedian on stage. Are the cheers and laughter heart-felt? If so, the feeling is indescribable. Rush? Helluva band as well. (Moving Pictures was one of my first albums as a kid. 1981?)

=====================================================================

Posted by rush | October 23, 2007 19:49
BT whats up with that Tirico show, it really sucks. I think you should take over that slot. It will be so much better!

BT: Easy there...Mike's one of my teammates, at the top of his profession, and he's the consummate professional. Politics are for people who feel threatened, so I only worry about what I can control--MY SHOW--but...thank you for the kind words.

=====================================================================

Posted by david | October 23, 2007 20:09
Whenever David Lee is on the floor, the Knicks are more successful. He has the highest plus-minus on the team. Why is it then, that he only plays 25-30 minutes a game, rather than 35 minutes plus?

BT: David, you're 100% correct, and it's easy to document: when Lee plays, the Knicks play better basketball. Still, I think it's been a bit circumstantial the past few seasons, because of Channing Frye. Frye was a subpar perimiter defender, and I think Isiah wanted to avoid having a frontcourt of Channing, David and Eddie for long stretches. That could absolutely change this season, especially if Lee knocks down a few J's. The secret's out NYC: Lee's terrific. He should merit more time.

=====================================================================

Posted by Hani | October 23, 2007 21:17
Hi BT! love your work! Do you think any of Knicks players will make the all star? What impact do you think Wilson Chandler will have this year? I like his game a lot, what player, past or present, does he compare to do you think?

BT: Hani, happy you enjoy my work, thank you. In terms of the All Star Game, wow, let's get to December 1st! Still, I would think that Randolph and Curry have the best chance, based on the potential offensive numbers they could put up. Still, if the Knicks are playing solid ball, and Lee's hauling in 12 rips a night, shooting 60% from the field and 80% from the stripe...He'll get a real look.

=====================================================================

Posted by Peso | October 23, 2007 21:34
Sup BT! Love your work man!
My Question is about Nate...
With the work he is putting in, do you think that he is capable of being the second coming of an A.Iverson caliber type player?
With Marbs on his way out...If consistent, will Coach Thomas retain N8 as the next Starting PG?
During the game with Boston at MSG, it seemed that N8 had a better handle of the team at point then Jamal when Marb's was on the bench...
What do you think?
Alan your Blog Rocks!

BT: Peso, let's allow Nate, to be Nate--because that's going to be pretty good. The comparison with Iverson, in terms of sheer physical stature, I understand, to an extent. Both are fearless, attack the rim (more so when AI was younger) and have good range. The difference is, one, Iverson's one of the greatest scorers in the history of the game, and two, he never really had a low post threat to feature, unlike Nate and the Knicks, who focus an inside/out offense. Do I think if Nate pumped up 25-30 shots a game like Iverson, that he could average 20+ ppg? Actually, I do. Won't happen here though. Never.

=====================================================================

Posted by Flybanjo | October 23, 2007 21:38
What five do you think Zeke will close out games with?
Seems like Marbury, Crawford, Balkman, Lee and Randolph would give them enough scoring options. And, while that unit is only OK defensively, it is very, very unlikely to give up an offensive rebound. Only problem is the backlash to leaving Eddy on the bench at crunch time. But, his poor free throw shooting and poor defense leave NYK vulnerable in late game situations.
Anyway, I'd love to hear your thoughts.

BT: flybanjo, great question, seriously. Depends on the night, with so many variables. Are any of the big men in foul trouble? Who's had the hot-hand? Did they come back from a double-digit deficit, thanks largely in part to the reserves? Is it the 3rd game in four nights, where fatigue might be a factor? All things considered even, here's safe bet for a few: Zach, Jamal and Lee.

=====================================================================

Posted by Don ADO | October 23, 2007 21:48
BT - There has been a lot of talk here about bringing Artest to NY, but at least for now, that ain't happening. But Zeke still needs to trim the roster, and it would obviously be better for the team to get something back than it would be to just cut players and/or burn contracts.
So the question is this - if there's a trade on the horizon, who do you see Zeke going after, and who is more likely to be dealt?

BT: Don ADO, this is why talk radio is so much fun, fans like you always looking to get better--BEFORE THE SEASON STARTS! I love it. In terms of trades, look at it this way: anything initially will be low-level, which won't bring back much in return. (read, future 2nd rounders) Can they package a few players, for a veteran PG (back-up) or defensive-minded center? Possible.

=====================================================================

Posted by asowholdings | October 23, 2007 22:59
Wassup BT?
I am a big fan bro. I listen to you on 1050 all the time. Keep it up man!

BT: asowholdings, thanks for the shout, sincerely. I've always maintained, it's a two-way street. There are other options on the radio dial, and if you choose me, it's my goal to bring it every night (day). That's one of my basic principles, always has been. I'll borrow a line from the Great Joe D..."You never know when someone's watching (listening) me play ball for the first time." (and by no means am I implying that I'm as talented as Joe D. I'll let you do that for me LOL)

=====================================================================

Posted by Anonymous | October 24, 2007 01:49
BT,
What do you think of a potential Nate-Stephon starting backcourt given Stephon's propensity to play better defense on shooting guards and the fact that Nate needs starters minutes?
Also, when everyone is healthy, what becomes of the three spot? I think we need Q because he can help spread the floor, he can defend and he can rebound. But for you, do you say Lee, Balkman, or Q?

BT: Personally, when Randolph gets a blow, I'd like to see the Lee/Curry tandem as much as possible, as Lee's ability to rebound allows Eddie to focus on putting the ball in the hole--something he does as well as any big man in the game. I've always been a big Q Rich fan. Certain people don't believe in taking shortcuts, and he's one of them. It's like that guy at the Y, or at the park, who might not run the fastest or jump the highest, but his team always stays on the court. That's Q. He's a winner, despite the overall record the past few seasons. If I'm in an alley, and I'm surrounded by punks with bats--Q's the guy I want next to--check that--in front of me.

=====================================================================

Posted by Don | October 24, 2007 06:23
BT,
What are the odds the Knicks play the type of defense needed to go far in the playoffs? Can Curry average more than 7 rpg and .5 bpg?
If Feb. rolls around and the D stinks, does I.T. pull the trigger on Artest?

BT: Don, personally, I will not rule out Artest until I actually see him in a uniform other than the one he's currently wearing. I believe he's in play, personally. As far as playing the type of defense--mid 90's Knick's D--that we've all been looking for, it just doesn't happen overnight. It will be better, based on the players familiarity with the system, but there's no Ben Wallace, or Oak or Mase. Artest would change things immediately, provided his head is on tight, and he's committed to balling.

=====================================================================

Posted by Alan | October 24, 2007 08:11
Good morning Fixers. The spot with BT on ESPN Radio went well for a first-time, long-time. They had me on earlier than expected (10:40 p.m.) and we had a 10 minute spot. BT is a passionate Knick fan who is a good sport and is also excited about answering your questions. Remember, the deadline is midnight tonight. He plugged the blog several times, so shouts to the Fixers were heard loud and clear on 50,000 watts.

BT: Alan, pass the Advil. My back is still barking from carrying you for 10 minutes. (Editor's Note: BT's ratings skyrocketed for that 10 minute spot, then plummeted once I hung up the phone. I have proof. Numbers don't lie! It's the Fixer Effect)

=====================================================================

Posted by Kevin Harewood | October 24, 2007 09:15
BT is a good radio host. Great information and eneergy on radio. I was a guest on his Live at PLay by PLay a couple of years ago and he made me feel right at home.
My Question. Dolan has seemingly given Isiah a reasonable chance to turn this thing around. What do you feel is the criteria this season for keeping this regime in charge?

BT: Good radio host? That's it? Just kidding Kevin, nice to hear from you. I remember many of the guests from the television show on MSG, but the name doesn't specifically ring a bell. What were you on for? As for outlining what will be interpreted as a success or a failure? How can it NOT be the playoffs, no? Just a guess.

=====================================================================

Posted by Matt B | October 24, 2007 09:39
BT - Love your show and your enthusiasm in the Knicks pre-game stuff (especially when there wasn't much to be enthusiastic about)..
I'm excited for this season, and that the Knicks seem to have at least have a legitimate shot at the playoffs. But does this team - as it's structured with Thomas at the helm and with Eddy Curry as our franchise player - have an inherently low ceiling? Are there enough pieces here to together a perennial championship contender sometime soon, or would that take a complete management and roster overhaul?

BT: Matt, thank you! I cherish the fact that I'm the first voice every Knick fan hears during our radio broadcasts on 1050, every game. Trust me, I've been going to the Garden since the early 80's when BK was regularly dropping 30, and Rory Sparrow and Darrell Walker were picking up full court for Hubie Brown. Heck, I was there when Louis Orr was skinny--wait, he still is. (Great guy by the way, raw deal at The Hall, in my opinion) You, however, are truly the entusiastic one! Perennial championship contender? Easy, one step at a time. Still, I see your point. Two things must happen: One, the overall team defense MUST improve a few levels, and two, the Knicks need to find their PG of the future. Steph's still good, very good...but he's not a kid.

=====================================================================

Posted by Tod | October 24, 2007 09:47
With so many scorers, do you think it would make sense to add Q Rich's scoring from the bench and get Lee's rebounds and D as a starter. I was thinking it might give Jamal more shots. And there are only so many shots.

BT: Tod, short but sweet. Not a crazy idea by any means, but again, if it's me--provided Q's hammy's/back are good to go, he's starting every night. He injects an immediate level of toughness, and accountability into every game. I wouldn't compromise that. Now, would I consider--read, consider--starting Q at the two and Lee and the three? Let's give it 15-20 games before we examine other line-ups.

=====================================================================

Posted by Jack | October 24, 2007 09:56
Do you really think Isiah Thomas sexually harassed Anucha by the hearsay that he said "I Love You"?

BT: Jack, let's talk hoops my man. It's time.

=====================================================================

Posted by Pablo | October 24, 2007 10:13
For those that missed AH on BT, here's the podcast:
http://espn-mp3-od.andomedia.com/stations/1367/071023_bt.mp3

BT: Atta' boy, Pablo, you're obviously internet-savvy, unlike Hahn, who carves out his blog every night on pieces of stone, and pays an intern at Newsday to put it on the web for him. (Editor's Note: This will be BT's last mailbag)

=====================================================================

Posted by Charlie O's | October 24, 2007 10:51
Brandon, thanks for taking the time to answer these mailbag questions. As a life-long Knick fan (I never saw a championship, Hubie Brown was the coach when I went to my first game at the garden) this is always the part of the year where we all get excited and think the team is going to be better. My question is two fold, first, how much better do you think this group is? Second, how far off (if they keep the core group together) is this team from being a force in the east?

BT: Charlie O's, you are welcome, I'm having fun. I'm guessing we're in the same exact age group...we've seen the same things, missing out on the two great, championship teams. In terms of improvement, I think the Knicks have a chance to be pretty good, I really do. Maybe they take on the "Rangers aura" from a season ago, we'll see. Listen, after a while, talk is cheap. Isiah knows it, the players know it, and you, the fans, certainly know it. They have an abundance of weapons, but based on where the team has been for a few years now...have they earned the benefit of the doubt? No, they haven't. That they'll have to earn. Should be a fun ride.

===================================================================

Posted by Jeremy | October 24, 2007 11:23
What will Fred Jones's role be on this team?

BT: Jeremy, I just got into this the other night on my show. I think his role will fluctuate as much as anyone on the team. One night he might be called into 15-18 minutes of prime minutes, and then collect a few DNP's. Isiah does like him, so he's obviously on the team, and will be called on to provide some D, and add a spark, probably on the second night of back/backs...He might steal Mardy's minutes.

=====================================================================

Posted by BAZ201 | October 24, 2007 12:40
BT,
To follow up on Hani's question; do you see anything special in Wilson Chandler? Does he look like a kid who can have a strong offensive game in 2-3 years?
Has Isiah ever done your show? If so, did you ask him any tough questions? Who was the broadcaster Isiah threatened to beat down if he ever saw him? My apologies if it's you.
Is your show on ESPN or anywhere online daily? I'm transplanted out of the tri-state.

BT: BAZ201, again more interest in Chandler, and I understand why. In terms of having Isiah on the show, yes, several times when I was doing middays with Steven A, and of course, before every home game during the regular season. Obviously, it's a different format, doing a 15-20 minute interview on a talk show and a more concise 6-7 minute pop as part of the pre-game package. I've said this many times: professionally, I have a solid rapport with Isiah, and genuinely enjoy our daily chats. Do I ask tough questions? I ask pertinent questions, and some will carry a level of "toughness," I guess. The difference being, for a pre-game show, you inquire, and maybe offer a brief follow-up. During my show, I have more time to dig as deeply as I see fit, and no--he's never threatened to "beat me down." Nobody has. If they do, Hahn has my back. They'll have to get past 470 pounds of combined muscle. LOL As for listening out of state, you bet: www.1050espnradio.com (Editor's Note: That makes you 230 lbs, BT)

=====================================================================

Posted by BAZ201 | October 24, 2007 13:16
With players like Jared and DNic possibly being waived soon are there any players from this "deep" draft that could be a steal. I see Philly waived Derrick Byars, are the other "potential ballers" out there that could become available as well?

BT: Did you watch the Sixers Wednesday night? Do you really want someone not good enough to play for them? Funny, everyone claims the 2007 Draft was deep, but let's allow it to play out. Remember when Chris Mullin tabbed (former Xaverian HS/Pitt star) Chris Taft in Round 2 a few years ago? It was roundly praised. Where's Taft now? This isn't the NFL. Generally, players cut, are cut for a reason. Generally. (not counting Starks and Mason, of course)

=====================================================================

Posted by GT | October 24, 2007 15:45
Why the heck do I still waste my time following the Knicks? Knick fan's should have a strike against Dolan/Thomas. Both so severely inept they are a match made in heaven or hell for us fans.

BT: GT, move away from the initial thing, it's confusing, and I had it first--at least publicly. LOL Why do you still root for the Knicks? Why did Jet fans show up in 1996 after a 3-13 debacle (I was one of those brain surgeons, by the way) in 1995? Because they are Jet fans. You root for the Knicks, and I'm guessing that you've always rooted for them. With real fans, that doesn't change. It's about the uniform.

=====================================================================

Posted by Alibaba | October 24, 2007 15:46
Brandon:
I feel that the best short and long term solution out of the roster logjam will be to buy out Jerome James (who is never going to contribute to the team anyway) and keep Nichols. This boy can shoot and he might eventually become a shooter in the Houston mold. If he does, he will greatly complement Curry and Randolph's inside game, perhaps even later this season.
However, I don't think Isiah has the guts to admit his mistake with James, especially after the trial. I will be very surprised if he does the right thing.
What do you think?

BT: Alibaba, I don't think the trial has anything to do with it, personally. It might be professional pride, in not cutting James loose, I really don't know. Listen, we all know Jerome hasn't brought much to the table, and again, personally, I'd find a way to keep the kid. Jerome in a lot of ways represents the early Isiah years, where there was a desperate need for height. He's been blown past by almost everyone on the roster. Which is good for the Knicks, bad for Jerome in terms of having a role.

=====================================================================

Posted by emac2 | October 24, 2007 16:49
Any word on Balkmans MRI yesterday?
Anything we can read from the silence?

BT: My man Hahn is all over this, I don't want to steal his thunder being that I've already given his blog more comments than he's ever had. Ouch! (hint, Balk's OK)

=====================================================================

Posted by jerod mustaf | October 24, 2007 20:57
if the knicks make one (realistic) trade this year, what is it?

BT: Jerod, as long as they don't bring your namesake back, everything should work out. Absolutely impossible to forecast, really. Did you see Steph, or Francis or Francis coming before they arrived? I didn't. They have assets, it's just a matter of how they play early, and how much they are willing to disrupt the core.

=====================================================================

Posted by Tod Lautenberg | October 24, 2007 21:42
Do you think David Lee could start at the 3 over Q?

BT: Tod, not right away, no. Still, Q needs to prove he can withstand the grind and pounding of a full 82 game slate. Trust me, the last guy you
want to willingly send to the bench...is Quentin. He does more than the average fan will ever know.

=====================================================================

Posted by Zdiddy | October 24, 2007 22:34
Hey BT,
We have to find a way to keep D-Nice. He is a big time shooter and will be a good NBA player. He could be our Kyle Korver, which will open things up for E-City and Zbo down low. With the lack of consistent outside shooting throughout the league, D-Nice is an assest that we have to keep.
Who should the Knicks cut?
Knicks fan for life............Go NY, Go NY, Go!!!!

BT: Just remember, even if he makes the team--and it doesn't look good--he will have a very limited role. Easy with the Korver, or Allan Houston comparisons. Right now, he's a fringe player who may not even be here in a few days.

=====================================================================

Posted by Patrick H | October 24, 2007 23:29
BT (or Alan)-- Last season, after the melee with Denver to the late February win at home against Miami (which was the beginning of the injury onslaught that capsized the season), the Knicks went 20-17 and snuck into the last playoff spot. It looked like they had ironed out some early season wrinkles and were building chemistry. For the Knicks to play like they did during that stretch for an entire season, it would seem that a real leader needs to emerge. Someone to to make sure they don't play down to their competition. Someone to galvanize them when they are sluggish and to calm them down when they are too exuberant. A floor commander, but not necessarily a guard. When I think of who could play that role, Q and Steph are the only two players that come to mind. Malik Rose certainly can certainly be a leader in the locker room, but doesn't contribute enough to impact games. The likely candidate would have to be Q, but do you see anyone else stepping up and making it 'his team.' Any dark horses? Or, will the Knicks still be void of a leader like they have been the past few seasons?

BT: Patrick, I love your angle. Leadership. Man, it's vital in pro sports, especially in hoops, when you play a few times a week and can get lethargic during the dark winter months. Is there a Willis Reed on this team? Doubt it. I think the leadership will come in several different forms, from several very different players. I see Nate and Lee energizing the team with spirited and youthful (and very productive) play; Q Rich is the physical leader, unafraid to get in someone's face, whether it's a teammate, or an opponent. And Malik Rose keeps things in order in the locker room. Who's the one guy everyone looks at when the Knicks are down a point with :20 to go? That person has yet to consistently step up. We'll see if someone grabs that role this season.

=====================================================================

Posted by shack | October 25, 2007 00:00
have you noticed a difference in the climate around MSG since the sex harrassment ruling? do you sense that some institutional integrity is being restored? i've read that Isiah is toning down all the bullcrap rhetoric he feeds the media, and now his responses to questions are very boilerplate, very benign, very safe. is he maturing as a GM/president?

BT: Personally Shack, I have never encountered a single problem, or anything resembling a conflict in my three years working Knick games. Remember, I also spent four seasons calling St. John's games, so I have spent a lot of time in that building recently, and speaking for myself, the only complaint would be the lack of wins. The people I interact with daily, Mike Breen, Johnny Hoops, Gus Johnson, Al Trautwig, Earl Monroe, John Starks, Allan Houston....I have enjoyed my time there, professionally. Personally, I've been exposed to some good people. Take it for what it's worth, but that's been MY experience.

**

Well done, BT. And thank you again.

This Knicks team is a pretty tight-knit group, which is something that carried over from last season. Like in any family, guys will have disputes and see the faults in each other, but they'd never reveal such things to outsiders.

Unless, you regularly steal a man's toiletries. Then it's on.

Malik Rose is the oldest sibling. He has the sage advice and perspective. He also has the best stuff. That's why everybody is always sneaking into his locker to snag a bottle of skin lotion or whatever it is he has in that magical squeeze bottle of skin goodness. The anti-ash creme of the gods in an NBA locker room is akin to an iPod in the subway. Show it off too much and you're likely to get jacked.

Whoever took my lotion and brush put it back!

This was Rose barking in the Knicks locker room after Wednesday's preseason win over the Sixers. He made sure to be near Nate Robinson's locker when he made his announcement. Nate was in the midst of packing up his stuff and conducting an interview with yours truly, who, as you all know, has gone from disciplining this dog with a rolled-up newspaper to driving his bandwagon.

Nate, a notorious culprit, quickly grabbed his toiletries bag and pulled out a bottle of lotion.

"Sorry!" he yelled, which caused the locker room to break up in laughter. "I accidentally...accidentally.."

Rose smirked with that "Yeah right" kinda look. Seeing what I saw, I couldn't resist.

"For the record, Malik," I said out loud, "the zipper was closed!"

"It was!" Nate then confessed. "I accidentally put it in there, Malik. I'm sorry. I took it so I wouldn't keep going into your locker!"

* *

You can't deny the difference in Robinson this season. Another reporter was interviewing him as I arrived at his locker and they were discussing his improved play. Nate said, "I don't know the word for it, but it's just different."

"The word you're looking for is 'focused'," I offered.

Nate nodded. "Yeah," he said. "It's been fun."

Speaking of fun, if you watched the game you might have seen Nate pay homage to Quentin Richardson (who didn't play because of a mild ankle sprain) after he hit his second three-pointer in the fourth quarter. For those who don't know, Q-Rich has this trademark three-point celebration of bouncing his fists off his forehead and flashing three fingers. He used to do this with teammate Darius Miles back in the day when the two were on the LA Clippers.

Q loved that Nate did it. "That's my little brother," he said after the game.

“I used to see him do it when I was in high school," Nate said. "I used to love it, he used to be one of my favorite players, he and Darius Miles.”

Q has never revealed what the symbol meant and when I asked him last night he said, "Nah, I'm taking that to the grave."

Maybe Nate would give up the exclusive if I grabbed Malik's lotion out of his now-vacant locker.

"He told me," Nate said, "but I can't tell."

* *

A lot is being made of Isiah Thomas' noticably dour mood when addressing the media. He has been uncharacteristically low-key and short with his answers. He's also resorting to offering cliches.

For the many faults we in the media have found in him, the one part any reporter had to appreciate was his willingness to answer your question (even if his answers were sometimes convenient or contradictory). Isiah would always be engaging and considerate.

No one knows what to make of this recent turn of events -- was he told by Dolan to be low-key? is he fed-up with the negative coverage? -- but I'm somewhat conflicted. As a member of the media, you would prefer the smiling, laughing and talkative Thomas.

But there is also the perspective that, after what he went through with the sexual harassment case and the fallout from that (has Al Sharpton ever publicly announced a result of his protest call against Thomas and the Garden?), why should we expect Thomas to be in a great mood? If he were all smiles and chatter, you know there would be some people who would question how serious he took the trial and the results of it.

* *

Eddy Curry picked up three offensive fouls in the first half, all against Calvin Booth. Calvin freakin Booth. One was because Eddy literally shoved Booth aside. Another was a charge that Booth drew as Eddy tried to muscle his way to the rim.

Is it a lack of respect from officials, who allow opponents to pound on Curry and then call him for the foul when he pounds back? The Shaq rules haven't applied to him so far, but that could be because when Shaq was looking for respect, he dished out some serious punishment, not just a mere shove. Once Eddy takes it upon himself to manhandle people and make opponents always wondering when Eddy might snap is the time he'll start getting that respect.

It sure is easier to say than do, however.

* *

Jamal Crawford today is unvieling a newly renovated "Crawford Library" at PS 58 (East Tremont) in the Bronx. Jamal's foundation has worked with the school since last year along with the non-profit group, PENCIL, in a $75,000 project that has given the school a desperately-needed upgrade to its library program.

"I made a promise to Principal Gunn last fall when I first partnered with the school through PENCIL,” Crawford said in a statement released by his foundation. “The state of the school’s library was unacceptable, and we agreed that the students deserved far better in order to get excited about reading and learning. I’m confident they will take full advantage of what this newly renovated library has to offer.”

Who in their right mind is coming to this game tonight? Seriously! It's raining, it's Wednesday and it's a preseason game against the Sixers.

Just kidding.

But seriously, cozy on the couch at home watching on MSG Network is how I'd rather catch this one. Unfortunately, my couch is still covered in tarp, my cable has not been turned back on and my TV room is plaster-covered and empty.

But the renovation is almost done. I might be painting this weekend and may start moving back in sometime next week! I know the Fixers out there care about this kind of critical information. I would care if it were you.

Here's what you really want to know:

Renaldo Balkman got the good news today. He can start jogging tomorrow and hopes in a week he'll be cleared for full-contact practice. The Balk Man is dying to get back into action. Sitting around just isn't his thing, even if he does often look half-asleep.

My man was rocking some diamond-studded Yankees ear rings (the interlocking 'NY') tonight, on the same night of Game 1 of the World Series. "Gotta represent my team," Balkman said.

Starting lineups:

KNICKS
Jeffries
Randolph
Curry
Crawford
Marbury

SIXERS
Evans
Iguodala
Booth
Green
Miller

Injuries:
Q-Rich is out with a mild sprain in his left ankle. Jerome, you know.

The Sixers are without Sam Dalembert (stress fracture in his left foot) and Louis Amundson (hip pointer).

Just a hunch, but I expect to see a lot of the bench tonight. Tons of minutes for Wilson Chandler. Maybe some Jared Jordan earlier than garbage time. Perhaps even Demetris Nichols. Friday against the Nets is the last preseason game and usually those are dress rehersals for the season.

Remember - midnight is the deadline for the Brandon Tierney mailbag. Get em in.

Enjoy the game.

Just look at this headshot. The suave man looking like a model for a watch ad -- nice timepiece, what is that, Timex? -- is "a friend of the program," as they say in his business. ESPN Radio host Brandon Tierney
, who also works the Knicks radio broadcasts, is a closet Fixer. He doesn't post here, but he's admitted to lurking. And we dig that about him, baby.

We also dig that he wants to promote the blog, show some love to the Fixer Nation. Maybe talk a little Knicks basketball if we have the time.

BT asked me to be on his show tonight (11:05 p.m. for you night owls) and in exchange, I've asked him to be on ours. He's agreed to do a mailbag session with his fellow Fixers. It'll be just like the usual deal - you post your questions here to this blog and I'll forward them to him.

The deadline for questions is Wednesday night, midnight. BT will have the replies back to me on Friday and I'll post them then.

Holla atcha boy!
(Oh wait, that's someone else's handle. We have to find BT a cool handle like that)

* *

* - Short practice today. A Syracuse TV station made the trip down to do a feature on Demetris Nichols. Oops!

Hopefully by now you've read my story from last night's game in today's Newsday. At the bottom was a report that Nichols' representation has asked the Knicks to cut the former Syracuse standout if he did not have a legit shot at making the roster. The Knicks have denied this request.

I don't blame Isiah for wanting to stick with vets and go with a guy like Fred Jones, who can defend off the bench. But if you know a rookie doesn't have a shot with you and you're not playing him in games or even much in practice, why not do the right thing by the kid and let him find another team before the final rosters are due?

* - The Knicks have a week to pick up the options on their Class of 2005 (N8, D-Lee and Mardy) and also Renaldo Balkman. It is expected all four will be picked up. Balkman was supposed to have an MRI done this afternoon regarding his "stress reaction" injury in his ankle. If there is news tonight (doubtful, they'll probably tell us tomorrow) I'll post it here.

Anyone who sat in traffic heading East on the LIE at rush hour, I feel for you. I drove by the burning car on the Eastbound side when I was heading into the Garden this afternoon. It was quite a bonfire. Not that you care.

No injuries to report other than Jerome James, who isn't going to dress because of ongoing left knee tendinitis.

Good news on Renaldo Balkman. He is going to see the doctor Tuesday to have the progress of his healing "stress reaction" injury in his ankle. If he's cleared, Renaldo will have about a week to prepare for the season opener.

Aw man, crazy. Like this pose.

Starting lineups:

KNICKS
Randolph
Richardson
Curry
Crawford
Marbury

CELTICS
Garnett
Pierce
Scalabrine (interesting*)
R. Allen
Rondo

* - A few Knicks suggested that Scalabrine is more effective as a tandem with Garnett than Kendrick Perkins. Scalabrine's ability to hit the deep ball and pull one big out of the paint opens up room for Garnett to work on the post. Though he's listed as a 4, Garnett is really playing center in this lineup. The key for the Knicks is to cause the matchup problem in the paint down at the other end of the floor.

We'll see how it goes. The game is on MSG Network. Enjoy, post your thoughts and I'll check in later tonight with the usual analysis.

A year ago, this blog began with a little history about the blogger, who was just moved from almost a decade of covering his first love, hockey, to basketball, the game of his youth. It's still in the archives if anyone is curious.

It was a lonely place back then and didn't even have a name. Just "On the Knicks beat." Over the past year it developed into "The Knix Fix" and Fixers started to arrive and congregate, deliberate . . .

. . . Hallucinate
Dessegregate
Mediate
Alleviate
Try not to hate
Love your mate
Don't suffocate on your own hate
Designate your love as fate . . . (INXS)

We grew, we emerged, we battled and we made great points and also made mistakes. One of the regular phrases used around here was that "the village is watching." Well, it takes a village to raise a blogger.

I thank you all. Looking forward to Year 2.

* *

Wanted to share with you Allan Houston's most recent blog on his personal website. He shares his thoughts on his brief stint at Knicks training camp and explains his thinking. Clearly he had doubts from the start, too, but not with his ability. It was with the choice he made.

I think we'll see him again with another team -- the Nets? -- later this season.

* *

I know you'll be watching tonight with KG and the Celts in the house. I expect Q-Rich to be fired up after his comments following the 40-point blowout loss last week in Beantown. I'll offer up some pregame buzz on the blog this evening and follow up in the morning with the usual breakdown.

That Kanye West has got my ear lately. The guy is a walking commercial jingle, his stuff just sticks in your head. And the OJ line cracks me up.

Th-that that don't kill me
Can only make me stronger
I need you to hurry up now
Cause I can't wait much longer
I know I got to be right now
Cause I can't get much wrong-er
Man I been waitin' all night now
That's how long I've been on ya

Don't act like I never told ya

News alert! Allan Houston didn't practice today.

Wait, none of the Knicks did.

Off a back-to-back preseason defeats to Boston and New Jersey, Isiah Thomas gave his team off from practice on Friday. They'll go back at it Saturday in the Open Practice at Hofstra. For anyone interested, admission is free and it starts at 11 a.m. Hofstra's pretty easy to get to -- right off the Meadowbrook Parkway, which you can get from the Northern State Parkway (known as the Grand Central Parkway in the city limits). Getcha first live look of the season.

It's been a bit rendundant to have to ask Houston on almost a daily basis about his chances to make this roster. Before the game in Boston, I asked him if there was a part of him that was trying to take it all in -- being out on the road with the team, the charter, the bus, etc. -- because this could be the last time he gets to experience it.

“I’m not even worrying about that, no," he said, rather quickly. "I mean, everything happens for a reason. I don’t look at it like this could be my last so I don’t even think about it.”

Houston had to know this was a futile attempt, even if he isn't getting much of a look so far (6 minutes in the blowout loss to Boston). The man deserves respect and credit for working hard enough to even get back to the point where he could play the game again. But after being told not to dress for his second preseason game, that should be the end of it right there.

You would think that if Allan was looking good in practices, Isiah would want to get him some legit minutes in preseason action. His lack of playing time suggests otherwise.

I just wonder if Isiah will let him take the Garden court one last time in these final three preseason games. If he does, let Houston enter to an ovation. And then be done with it.

* *

Analysis of a couple of moves by Isiah in the loss to the Nets:

1. He sat Stephon, which he says was partly to rest him on a back-to-back but also to see Jamal at the point. In the first half, the Knicks offense moved the ball much better than it did in Boston. Crawford and Curry hooked up for several of those trademark lob oops we saw last season. Still no pick-and-pop stuff with Zach Randolph. Instead, the Knicks were doing a lot of isolation plays and moving the ball around the horn to get it from strong side to weak side. Very basic.

Jamal can play the point, but he's clearly more of a two-guard. Still not pleased with his defense, though he made more of an effort against the Nets than he did in Boston.

When Isiah said Stephon was sitting out the game, I actually was more interested to see if he'd start Nate Robinson at the point. Instead, he started Jamal and slid Quentin Richardson up to the 2 spot (quick observation, Q isn't quick enough for that spot but gets more looks on offense there). Nate did get time at point, but it wasn't anything extra. He came in off the bench to play 18:39, which was a little disappointing. Nate struggled offensively with an 0-for-8 shooting night and just one assist. He did have four steals and only one turnover.

But I wanted to see more of that guy we saw in Summer League. The guy who ran the offense, told guys where to go, fed players who needed to be fed. IMHO, the Knicks, with all of their low-post scoring, need a PG who looks like the guy who ran their summer league team. Isiah even said that Nate was consistently the best player every single day in practice. Why it hasn't carried over into the games yet is something a coach needs to address.

2. Jared Jeffries started at the 3. I actually thought Jeffries played well. He did a good job defending Richard Jefferson and then in the second quarter he started picking up Vince Carter. Jeffries, when he's focused and intense (not always the case with him, unfortunately), is a very smart defensive player with long arms who knows where to move on the court. Case in point, he was guarding Carter on one play and Carter used Magloire for a screen, which caused a switch. Magloire then posted up Jeffries and when the pass came in, Jeffries attempted Malik Rose's patented "pull the chair" move. Magloire was called for traveling. Jared couldn't hide his smile as he ran down the court.

Honestly, I don't want a smiling Jared Jeffries. I want the bearded guy from the summer with a mean streak. I want an athletic 6-11 guy who isn't afraid to throw himself into the paint and swat some shots aside or explode at the rim to dunk home rebounds. Jeffries has this in him physically, but its the determination -- the grit -- that he needs to display more often.

By the way, Jared only played 13:34, most of which (7:37 to be exact) was in the first half, so I wouldn't put too much thought into a theory that he was being showcased. That contract will be almost impossible to move.

Oh and get this: Jeffries was 6-for-6 from the line. See what extra practice does for you, kids?

3. Rookie Wilson Chandler played the most minutes off the bench; 29:11 to be exact. He hit a couple of threes and dunked on the fast break, had 8 points and 7 rebounds and three steals. He also had three turnovers (one for having his foot on the sideline wh