These closing statements are as bad as the questions have been throughout this debate. I hope it really is the last one. Obama at least mentions "change from the bottom up" and that is honestly the difference between the two. Theories of change abound, but Obama's squares most with mine, and in my experience, with most young people's view of their government and how it should respond to its citizens.
— Dan
Bloggers
Blogroll
- The Swamp
- Spin Cycle
- The Caucus, The New York Times
- Politico
- The Huffington Post
- Daily Kos
- Redstate
- The Nation
- Political Animal
- Stumper, Newsweek
- Wonkette
- Free Republic
- The Hill
- The Plank (The New Republic)
- Roll Call
- Campaign Junkie, Slate
- Democracy Now!
- Media Matters
- Salon
- The Trail
- The Fix
- Washington Wire (WSJ)
- Talking Points Memo
- The Corner (National Review)
- Political Wire
- Contentions (Commentary)
Subscribe
« Penniless Meg's lesson learned | Main | Clinton has more tangible results »
Obama's view squares with Dan's
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://blogs.trb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-t.cgi/64661
Search
Recent Posts
- Vice presidential picks to be announced
- Triple threat for McCain; one big threat for Obama
- Whose convention is it?
- McCain, take the media focus off Obama
- Hillary's not-so-rosy campaign
- Cindy McCain hand-strangled
- Figuring it out: Fairness or redistribution?
- Obama, don't get excited about your GOP backers
- Edwards and 'Kenneth': Separated at birth?
- The Boyles talk Edwards
[What is this?]
Categories
- Adrian Lee
- Affirmative action
- Amara Birman
- Bragg Van Antwerp
- Campaigning
- Conventions
- Dan Goldman
- David Freedlander
- Debate
- Development
- Dontre L. Conerly
- Emily Ngo
- Endorsements
- Environment
- Figuring it out
- Funny
- Health care
- History
- Jeff Akston
- Kimberly Reynolds
- LaShawnda Jones
- Lynne Serpe
- Matt Knox
- Media coverage
- Meg Boyle
- Nomination process
- On site
- On the "Internets"
- Polling
- Talker of the week
- Third-party politics
- Trail Mix
- Vice presidents