For Bush, a fight to the finish: The Swamp
The Swamp
Posted September 29, 2007 9:44 AM
The Swamp

by Mark Silva

President Bush wants to talk about the Democrats, and all their spending.

He'll be doing it on the radio today, and he'll be doing it as he travels next week to familiar and friendly terrirtory, Lancaster, Pa., to complain about the fiscal irresponsibility of Democrats who want to tax and spend Americans out of prosperity.

It's part of a way to define himself against the Democratic Congress as the election year nears, a way to rally his base behind vetoes and veto threats. Critics say Bush is a W "come-lately'' to the discipline of fiscal control -- former Fed chief Alan Greenspan says the lack of vetoes until now helped get the Republicans in the hole they're in today.

And, as Bush vetoes a children's health care bill offering an expansion of coverage for lower- and middle-income families, the president runs the risk of alienating voters who may like some of the benefits that he is determined to veto. For more, see the story in today's Tribune:

For Bush, a fight to the finish

Veto pledge on kids' health bill
part of bid to rally base for next election,
analysts say

By Mark Silva
Washington Bureau

WASHINGTON - President Bush has picked a surprising place to make a stand.

He has vowed to veto a bill passed by the Senate that provides children with health care, a measure with wide bipartisan support and clear public appeal.

The president contends the measure is part of a wrong-headed march toward "nationalized medicine," far too costly and too expansive. His veto threat is part of a new tactic to try to paint his political opponents as reckless spenders, a posture that could win Bush admirers among fiscal conservatives. It allows him to draw a sharper contrast between himself and Democrats.

A version of this movie has played before. After Republicans gained control of Congress in 1994, President Bill Clinton began speaking out against the controlling party, a strategy that led to a resurgence in Clinton's popularity.

But Bush's approach in some cases also carries peril, because the president is tackling causes that could work against his popularity and that of his party as it fights to retain control of the White House.

Bush has vowed to veto spending bills, accusing the Democrats of fiscal recklessness, which could lead to a major showdown this fall. He faced down Democrats over attempts to de-escalate the Iraq war, suggesting they are embracing defeat. And he has rejected the expansion of the children's health insurance approved by the House and Senate this week.

With Bush's own standing near his all-term low in opinion polls, experts say there may be little that he can accomplish to improve his image for the rest of his term.Yet the contrast that Bush draws with Democrats on taxes, spending and the war could rally the GOP base for the 2008 elections.

Doug Schoen, a Democratic pollster who served Clinton, sees sense in Bush's strategy.

"Given where his numbers stand, it can't hurt. It could help," Schoen said.

The danger for Bush is that he could be on the wrong side of public opinion on many of these issues. Voters mostly oppose the war, and his stance on health insurance for children is politically perilous. Even on spending, Bush leaves himself open to charges of inconsistency because he refused to veto spending items during the six years the GOP controlled Congress.

"He is looking for places to draw lines in the dust," said Norman Ornstein, resident scholar at the American Enterprise Institute. But "I think the [children's health care] issue is a mistake politically."

Clinton, Schoen said, was advancing an agenda of his own, while Bush has largely been forced to play defense.

Still, Ornstein suggested, Bush has few options but to seek a foil in the Democrats.

"This is a choice made out of weakness," Ornstein said. "Your basic choice is to fall back on energizing your base. ... You've got to try and go back to basics, which is to be tough on fiscal responsibility and the size of government, and take on the Democrats."

There is still one positive element of the domestic agenda Bush is pressing this fall: Re-enactment of the No Child Left Behind Act that was passed in 2001. Yet this, too, is cause for conflict with Democrats and some Republicans who once supported the measure, but now complain it has burdened teachers with teaching for tests demanded by the government.

Bush's standing with the public has modestly rebounded in recent weeks, with public approval rising to 36 percent in the latest Gallup Poll, Sept. 14-16. That was up from 31 percent in mid-July, which matched the all-time Gallup low that Bush reached in May 2006.

Yet, with the failure of immigration reform and the shelving of Social Security and tax reforms, Bush is left with little of his own initiatives to present Congress, save an increasing bill for war.

This has placed Bush on defense, a position that he is attempting to play to its fullest as his party prepares for 2008.

In an e-mail fundraising appeal to Republicans signed by Bush this week, he said that "Republicans cut taxes for everybody who pays taxes" while warning that the Democrats "want to return to the days of tax and spend."

The president, in his conflict with Congress, may find plenty of chances to reclaim the mantle of fiscal control.

"I believe the worst thing that can happen now is to allow the Congress to do that which they have said they want to do, which is to raise the taxes on people," Bush said at his last press conference. "I think I got a B in Econ 101. I got an A, however, in keeping taxes low."

Digg Delicious Facebook Fark Google Newsvine Reddit Yahoo

Comments

Mr. Bush has no right to talk about spending. What we have spent for this war could have done wonders for ourselves. This war was plain and simple...a bad idea and managed even worse. This will cost us more than we can even imagine. How can people accept poor judgement from our leaders?


"For Bush, a fight to the finish"?

No one in the Prez 29% family has ever been in a fight....they always hire someone to fight for them.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/dusty1215/1399882367/


For Bush, and apparently all his enablers in the Republican party, the only GOOD spending is for WAR! And when you don't have a war, you find one and start it!

This man is such a hypocrite. It beggars the imagination.


Bush is right on about Democrats and taxation. The Democrats in Cook County want to increase the sales tax 272 percent from 75 cents a hundred to $2.75. Anyone here get a 272 percent pay increase lately. Not me! The worst of it is, they'll probably get it thanks to one-party government in Cook County, Chicago and Illinois. I thought the Soviet Union tried one-party government. Whatever happened to it?


President George W. Bush has been a pretty good USA President when you look at the facts, that he was the first white USA President, to have a mult-colored Presidential Cabinet, and two black Secretary Of States, general Colin Powell, and Dr. Condoleeza Rich. President George W. Bush also gave the USA working people at least $5000 worth of tax refund checks. If we have a Democrat President, you will see a big increase in federal income taxes, and an increase in military spending because they will reinstate in the military draft. You will also not recive another tax refund check, but the poor people will see a end to the government Food Stamp Program for poor Americans.


Bush also gave the USA working people at least $5000 worth of tax refund checks.

We've always had to pay since he got into office. So who got our check???


"and an increase in military spending because they will reinstate in the military draft."
Posted by: Anonymous | September 29, 2007 1:32 PM

You're a little confused on cause and effect, son. The draft will have to be reinstated if the current Commander in Chief decides to further expand the war further away from Al Qaeda who attacked us to include Iran, who didn't.

Maybe speaking about a draft will start to focus the minds of all the chickenhawk "patriots" on what an attack on Iran would actually entail; i.e. real commitment and sacrifice for an elusive goal. As is, "the surge" in Iraq must end in April as the tours cannot be extended further, and there is no one in the queue to take their places.

If America doesn't want a draft, stop making war where diplomacy would serve our goals better.


Here's Republican Prez 29%'s buddy Rush Gasbag, in all his "glory".
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dqThj96Gzzs


Almost $600 billion dollars to invade and occupy Iraq; now he's asking for another $190 billion for JUST ONE YEAR. But when asked to spend much less than that of taxpayer money on health care for uninsured American children - THAT COSTS TOO MUCH!

What a loser! Somebody start a coup and exile this jerk to some South Pacific island!


[quote]
President George W. Bush has been a pretty good USA President when you look at the facts, that he was the first white USA President, to have a mult-colored Presidential Cabinet, and two black Secretary Of States, general Colin Powell, and Dr. Condoleeza Rich. President George W. Bush also gave the USA working people at least $5000 worth of tax refund checks. If we have a Democrat President, you will see a big increase in federal income taxes, and an increase in military spending because they will reinstate in the military draft. You will also not recive another tax refund check, but the poor people will see a end to the government Food Stamp Program for poor Americans.

Posted by: Anonymous | September 29, 2007 1:32 PM
[/quote]

You're kidding, right? The skin color or nationality of anyone in the Cabinet is irrelevant - all that matters is their COMPETENCE, and Bush's lackys have been TOTALLY incompetent. Can you post a link to any story showing an accomplishment by Sec. of State Rice? Can you? Of course not - because she HAS NONE!

I don't know where you fabricated this $5000 refund" number from; the only "refund" I've ever gotten from Shrub was a $600 check that was nothing more than an ADVANCE on my own tax refund that I would have gotten 6 months later!

Oh, and ADDING an extra $1.6 trillion dollars to the National Debt in 6 years is not a sign of someone being a good financial steward of taxpayer money. The Democrats in the White House and Congress will have to raise taxes to pay off the debts run up by Shrub and our recent Republican Congress.


Why pollute a perfectly good South Pacific Island????


Does anyone really listen to George Bush on fiscal matters? I can't imagine a man with more of a credibility gap.

Fuzzy math.


It's almost like Bush is TRYING to completely dismantle the GOP.


Post a comment

(Anonymous comments will not be posted. Comments aren't posted immediately. They're screened for relevance to the topic, obscenity, spam and over-the-top personal attacks. We can't always get them up as soon as we'd like so please be patient. Thanks for visiting The Swamp.)

Please enter the letter "r" in the field below:

Quizzes

palin or fey

Palin or Fey?

McCain

Know the presidents?

McCain

Your McCain IQ

Obama

Your Obama IQ

Latest polls

Electoral vote map

map

Test your scenarios

Galleries

Palin

Sarah Palin

campaign

Campaign trail

conventions

RNC | DNC

Unauthorized tour

Obama

Obama's Chicago

News, but funnier

Cartoon

Walt Handelsman

Cartoon

The Lowe- Down

Cartoon

Joe Fournier

Cartoon

Editorial cartoons

Candidate match


Test assumptions