<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <title>The TV Zone</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://weblogs.newsday.com/entertainment/tv/blog/" />
    <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://weblogs.newsday.com/entertainment/tv/blog/atom.xml" />
   <id>tag:weblogs.newsday.com,2008:/entertainment/tv/blog//56</id>
    <link rel="service.post" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blogs.trb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=56" title="The TV Zone" />
    <updated>2008-07-03T20:33:40Z</updated>
    
    <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 3.36</generator>
 
<entry>
    <title>Michael Strahan on &quot;Chuck&quot;:  First Pix</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://weblogs.newsday.com/entertainment/tv/blog/2008/07/michael_strahan_on_chuck_first.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blogs.trb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=56/entry_id=112005" title="Michael Strahan on &quot;Chuck&quot;:  First Pix" />
    <id>tag:weblogs.newsday.com,2008:/entertainment/tv/blog//56.112005</id>
    
    <published>2008-07-03T19:57:54Z</published>
    <updated>2008-07-03T20:33:40Z</updated>
    
    <summary> Remember we told you a week or so ago that Michael Stomp &apos;Em Out Strahan was gonna do a cameo on &quot;Chuck&quot; for the Oct. 20? You don&apos;t? No matter. We&apos;re telling you now. In any event, we got...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Verne Gay</name>
        
    </author>
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://weblogs.newsday.com/entertainment/tv/blog/">
        <![CDATA[<p><img alt="012R7339a_lr.jpg" src="http://weblogs.newsday.com/entertainment/tv/blog/012R7339a_lr.jpg" width="500" height="333" /></p>

<p> Remember we told you a week or so ago that <strong>Michael Stomp 'Em Out Strahan</strong> was gonna do a cameo on<strong> "Chuck"</strong> for the Oct. 20? You don't? No matter. We're telling you now. In any event, we got right here the first pictures of Iron Mike's very first acting performance in a TV show. Based on these, I predict an Emmy...<br />
 <br />
<img alt="IMG_7094a_lr.jpg" src="http://weblogs.newsday.com/entertainment/tv/blog/IMG_7094a_lr.jpg" width="333" height="500" /align=right> Storyline: He plays<strong> Mitch,</strong> who's the boss of some store near <strong>Buy More</strong>, and his staff has taken to hanging out in Buy More's Home Theater Center. That leads to various frictions, conflicts, whatever, and there's a face-off between <strong>Morgan</strong> and Mitch. Only problem: Mitch is about 275 pounds, and he singlehandedly stomped out the <strong>New England Patriots</strong> (along with <strong>Osi Umenyiora </strong>and a few others; go <strong>Jints</strong>.) </p>

<p>  Why why why is Mike doing this? After all..he just joined Fox Sports a week ago as an analyst with <strong>Terry Bradshaw, Howie Long, Jimmy Johnson, and show host Curt Menefee.</strong> (He announced his retirement June 5.)  My guess is - fun, and covering of bets..."If <strong>Brit</strong> can do this," he mused to himself, " So can I..." </p>

<p><strong>  Photos by Adam Taylor/Warner Bros. Television; thanks Adam...and Diana.</strong></p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>ABC: Imperioli Will Join &quot;Life on Mars&quot;</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://weblogs.newsday.com/entertainment/tv/blog/2008/07/abc_imperioli_will_join_life_o.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blogs.trb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=56/entry_id=111974" title="ABC: Imperioli Will Join &quot;Life on Mars&quot;" />
    <id>tag:weblogs.newsday.com,2008:/entertainment/tv/blog//56.111974</id>
    
    <published>2008-07-03T18:35:25Z</published>
    <updated>2008-07-03T19:41:48Z</updated>
    
    <summary> Okay, now that we&apos;ve got a firm &quot;yes&quot; from ABC we might as well go ahead and tell you, if you don&apos;t already know: Michael Imperioli will indeed join &quot;Life on Mars&quot; for the fall. Reported in the trades...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Verne Gay</name>
        
    </author>
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://weblogs.newsday.com/entertainment/tv/blog/">
        <![CDATA[<p><img alt="hot-list-Michael-Imperioli-1.jpg" src="http://weblogs.newsday.com/entertainment/tv/blog/hot-list-Michael-Imperioli-1.jpg" width="240" height="150" /align=right> Okay, now that we've got a firm "yes" from ABC we might as well go ahead and tell you, if you don't already know: <strong>Michael Imperioli </strong>will indeed join "Life on Mars" for the fall. Reported in the trades yesterday but ABC has now said that in fact this will happen. "LOM?" Based on the Brit show of the same name and about a cop (<strong>Jason O'Mara</strong> in this version) who's hit by a car and wakes up to find himself in the early '70s. We've got a fish-outta-water tale, with cultural issues, policing styles, etc. and a general commentary on society (and social mores.) <strong>David E. Kelley</strong> was attached, then unattached. But <strong>Christophah</strong> is definitely attached: He'll play Det. Ray Carling,  who'll be partner to O'Mara's Sam Tyler. </p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>&quot;Friends&quot; Flick: The One in Which They&apos;re Middleaged</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://weblogs.newsday.com/entertainment/tv/blog/2008/07/friends_flick_the_one_in_which.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blogs.trb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=56/entry_id=111862" title="&quot;Friends&quot; Flick: The One in Which They're Middleaged" />
    <id>tag:weblogs.newsday.com,2008:/entertainment/tv/blog//56.111862</id>
    
    <published>2008-07-03T12:28:47Z</published>
    <updated>2008-07-03T18:33:30Z</updated>
    
    <summary> After years of speculation, this could happen, finally. A &quot;Friends&quot; movie, with all the original friends. Older, wiser, and still friends. The British press - of all places - is filled with stories this morning that a reunion movie...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Verne Gay</name>
        
    </author>
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://weblogs.newsday.com/entertainment/tv/blog/">
        <![CDATA[<p>   <img alt="10362__friends_l.jpg" src="http://weblogs.newsday.com/entertainment/tv/blog/10362__friends_l.jpg" width="270" height="270" /align=right> After years of speculation, this could happen, finally. <strong>A "Friends" movie</strong>, with all the original friends. Older, wiser, and still friends.<strong> The British press</strong> - of all places - is filled with stories this morning that a reunion movie has finally been agreed to, and of course they're all referring to the fact that "Sex" did so well, so therefore the cast (and Warner Bros.) has "incentive," both financial and emotional. Plus...the principals haven't  exactly decamped to <strong>George Clooney-land</strong>, so why not? </p>

<p>  Here's the <strong>Guardian lede</strong>, which - like me - can't resist the play on "The One in Which..."</p>

<p>  "Will it be The One Where They Make a Movie, or <strong>The One Where They Talk About Making a Movie and Then Never Get Around to Actually Doing It? </strong>Either way, the Hollywood rumour mill is currently abuzz with speculation that the cast of Friends could be set for a reunion on the big screen. Spurred by the box office success of the Sex and the City movie, Warner Bros has reportedly green-lit a feature-length overhaul of the hit TV sitcom about six bantering Manhattan buddies."</p>

<p> <strong> The Mail</strong> says everyone's on board, etc., so this can and will really happen. </p>

<p>  As you know, the final two-parter aired four years ago May. These guys - of course - won't be middle-aged, but heaven knows, the bloom of youth has given way to something entirely different. Still, a hit is a hit is a hit. This one could, maybe, work. </p>

<p>  [BTW, the vigilant TVtattle.com found this quote from <strong>Lisa Kudrow</strong> from a week ago in the National Ledger. She make's a pretty good point here: "I think it would be so fun to be with all those people again, but our show was not like 'Sex and the City,' which was a single camera, filmic show anyway. Ours was multi-camera, in front of a live audience. It's a completely different feel. You'd have to bring the tone down, and I don't know how it would be. I'll just stay open."]<br />
</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>WaPo&apos;s &quot;Lost Book Club&quot;</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://weblogs.newsday.com/entertainment/tv/blog/2008/07/wapos_lost_book_club.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blogs.trb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=56/entry_id=111736" title="WaPo's &quot;Lost Book Club&quot;" />
    <id>tag:weblogs.newsday.com,2008:/entertainment/tv/blog//56.111736</id>
    
    <published>2008-07-02T20:29:38Z</published>
    <updated>2008-07-02T20:39:35Z</updated>
    
    <summary> And...before I let this oversight go one more minute, did you know that the Washington Post has a &quot;Lost Book Club&quot; too? ABC.com launched one yesterday, but the WaPo&apos;s Jen Chaney tells me they&apos;ve had one up and running...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Verne Gay</name>
        
    </author>
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://weblogs.newsday.com/entertainment/tv/blog/">
        <![CDATA[<p> <img alt="lost.jpg" src="http://weblogs.newsday.com/entertainment/tv/blog/lost.jpg" width="45" height="45" /align=right><br />
 And...before I let this oversight go one more minute, did you know that <strong>the Washington Post has a "Lost Book Club" too?</strong> ABC.com launched one yesterday, but the<strong> WaPo's Jen Chaney</strong> tells me they've had one up and running for months. Says Jen, "I thought you might be interested in taking a look at our Lost page, which features an archive of our book club material, including the blog posts announcing each month's book selections and the online discussions on each one. We kicked it off last July with<strong> 'Watership Down.'"</strong> <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/artsandliving/television/features/2007/lost-central/index.html"> So...check it out here. It's a terrific page in general for "Losties" and not just Losties who are lit majors...<br />
</a><br />
 </p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Fox News Makes Timesmen Crazy Ugly</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://weblogs.newsday.com/entertainment/tv/blog/2008/07/fox_news_makes_timesmen_ugly.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blogs.trb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=56/entry_id=111704" title="Fox News Makes Timesmen Crazy Ugly" />
    <id>tag:weblogs.newsday.com,2008:/entertainment/tv/blog//56.111704</id>
    
    <published>2008-07-02T19:06:17Z</published>
    <updated>2008-07-03T20:36:18Z</updated>
    
    <summary> It&apos;s not often you open a press release from the folks at Media Matters and laugh out loud, but that&apos;s pretty much what I did this afternoon. Ever-enterprising, &quot;MM&quot; studied some photos of NY Times TV reporter, Jacques Steinberg,...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Verne Gay</name>
        
    </author>
            <category term="Fox" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://weblogs.newsday.com/entertainment/tv/blog/">
        <![CDATA[<p> It's not often you open a press release from<strong> the folks at Media Matters</strong> and laugh out loud, but that's pretty much what I did this afternoon. Ever-enterprising, "MM" studied some photos of NY Times TV reporter, <strong>Jacques Steinberg</strong>, and TV editor, <strong>Steve Reddicliffe</strong> (which Fox News aired on "Fox & Friends" this ayem) and determined that they had been photoshopped. </p>

<p>  Photoshopped in a way not particularly complimentary to my hard-working counterparts at the <strong>Gray Lady</strong>. In fact, I do believe Fox turned them into serial killers or psychopaths. You be the judge...</p>

<p>  What was their sin? Having the GALL  to question the fact that FNC's ratings are blah while CNN/MSNBC's are growing. Here's what<strong> Loosey Goosey Doocy</strong> said on the air this morning:   </p>

<p>  "There was a hit piece by somebody in The New York Times. The writer was a fellow by the name of Jacques Steinberg, and he's been doing a bunch of attack stories on Fox News Channel. Well, there's some backstory to it, and that is this: His boss, the guy who assigned him to this, is a fellow by the name of Steven Reddicliffe, and Mr. Reddicliffe actually used to work for this company. He worked -- I think he was the editor in charge of TV Guide until circulation went down under his tenure -- something like, 40 percent. So, he got fired, and according to Radar Online, this guy has had an ax to grind."</p>

<p>  Then, up come the pictures! MM has the real pix on the left, the doctored FNC one is on the right...Get me <strong>makeup!!!</strong> </p>

<p><img alt="3_image002.jpg" src="http://weblogs.newsday.com/entertainment/tv/blog/3_image002.jpg" width="400" height="335" /></p>

<p><img alt="4_image003.jpg" src="http://weblogs.newsday.com/entertainment/tv/blog/4_image003.jpg" width="400" height="335" /></p>

<p><br />
  Naturally, got me to thinking - what would those<strong> photoshop trolls</strong> at FNC do to ME if I had the temerity to question the deterioration of their ratings...</p>

<p><img alt="vernegay.jpg" src="http://weblogs.newsday.com/entertainment/tv/blog/vernegay.jpg" width="120" height="90" /align=left><img alt="jabba%20the%20hut.jpg" src="http://weblogs.newsday.com/entertainment/tv/blog/jabba%20the%20hut.jpg" width="300" height="210" /align=right><br />
</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Shando to &quot;90210?&quot;</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://weblogs.newsday.com/entertainment/tv/blog/2008/07/shando_to_90210.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blogs.trb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=56/entry_id=111575" title="Shando to &quot;90210?&quot;" />
    <id>tag:weblogs.newsday.com,2008:/entertainment/tv/blog//56.111575</id>
    
    <published>2008-07-02T13:37:37Z</published>
    <updated>2008-07-02T17:38:25Z</updated>
    
    <summary> This is big news, so I&apos;m afraid I&apos;m going to have to ask you to sit down. Have you sat down yet? Good. Well, here it is. Oh wait, you&apos;ve already read my headline, so you know what I&apos;m...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Verne Gay</name>
        
    </author>
            <category term="beverly hills 90210 remake" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://weblogs.newsday.com/entertainment/tv/blog/">
        <![CDATA[<p><img alt="1.jpg" src="http://weblogs.newsday.com/entertainment/tv/blog/1.jpg" width="375" height="500" /align=right><br />
 This is big news, so I'm afraid I'm going to have to ask you to sit down. </p>

<p>  Have you sat down yet? </p>

<p>  Good. Well, here it is. Oh wait, you've already read my headline, so you know what I'm about to lay on you:<strong> Shannen Doherty</strong> is "in talks" to join the <strong>"Bev Hills 90210" </strong>remake, although I must say that the phrase "in talks" as it applies to Doherty seems rather tame: I'd prefer "in screams."</p>

<p>  So let's go with that.<strong> Shannen Doherty</strong> is in screams to return to the show that made her Shannen Doherty. <strong>Perez Hilton</strong> is reporting this this ayem, and I'm of a mind to believe it. The reasons are evident. She's trying to sell one of her <strong>Malibu homes</strong> (how many does she have? I don't know.  Hold up your hand and count your fingers.) Her TV career, such as it once was, has been reduced to<strong> "Breaking up with Shannen Doherty."</strong> She is now, and pretty much ever has been, famous for being infamous. Why not be in screams to return to this re-make? </p>

<p>  If true - and again, I believe it - then this would catapult this show <strong>(which could actually save the entire CW from cancellation)</strong> into a whole new realm. Of course, a great and exciting realm. First of all, the newbie would have to deal with a vast amount of back stuff - like where DID Brenda disappear to after season four, and was her love with Dylan forever and ever, or just one of<strong> those primetime fling things?</strong></p>

<p>  And of course, if you bring back Brenda, you gotta deal with<strong> Dylan</strong> - who was, I'm also insulting you with this utterly needless reminder, <strong>Luke Perry.</strong> What about Dylan? Will the producers try to get a cameo outta Luke? Will he even show up to the same room as Doherty? And<strong> Brandon? </strong>He's roaming out there in primetime limbo too. With Brenda on-board, that's going to have to be resolved too. It's not enough to write the script this way: Brenda: "Oh yes, I still deeply love Dylan, whereever he is...Brandon's on the phone? I'll take it..." </p>

<p>  <strong>Jason</strong> - will you too take the call from the producers? </p>

<p>  Meanwhile, if you're still with me, here's a six-minute clip from the ten-year re-union. Proves that the rest of the cast doesn't TOTALLY hate<strong> Shando,</strong> but then these are actors. One never knows, does one? <br />
 <br />
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/sdu-hjq7EtA&hl=en"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/sdu-hjq7EtA&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object><br />
</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Boomer TV: Lawrence Welk hangs ten!</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://weblogs.newsday.com/entertainment/tv/blog/2008/07/boomer_tv_surf_music_on_lawren.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blogs.trb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=56/entry_id=111157" title="Boomer TV: Lawrence Welk hangs ten!" />
    <id>tag:weblogs.newsday.com,2008:/entertainment/tv/blog//56.111157</id>
    
    <published>2008-07-02T10:50:33Z</published>
    <updated>2008-07-02T10:55:29Z</updated>
    
    <summary>Today marks the 53rd anniversary of the debut of &quot;The Lawrence Welk Show,&quot; which is still airing in reruns on WLIW (and many other PBS stations). I am a big-time, Johnny-come-lately fan of the show, something that I am not...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Andy Edelstein</name>
        
    </author>
            <category term="Andy Edelstein" />
            <category term="Boomer Tube" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://weblogs.newsday.com/entertainment/tv/blog/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Today marks the 53rd anniversary of  the debut of <a href="http://www.oeta.onenet.net/welk/">"<strong>The Lawrence Welk Show," </strong></a>which is still airing in reruns on WLIW (and many other PBS stations). I am a big-time, Johnny-come-lately fan of the show, something  that I am not ashamed to admit and in fact have said so many times in the pages of the Newsday.</p>

<p>Anyway, the idea that Mr. Welk was hostile to rock and roll is not 100% true. And I'm not just talking about the time his clean-cut crew performed <strong>Brewer and Shipley's </strong>1971 druggie hit. "One Toke Over the Line." (The video briefly became <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ye3ecDYxOkg">an internet sensation </a>last year.)</p>

<p>In this clip from 1963, the surf band <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/<strong>The_Chantays</strong>">The Chantays</a>, whose<strong> "Pipeline" </strong>is one of the coolest r&r instrumentals of all time, performed on the show. Well, actually from the looks of it, they're instument-syncing, but the point is, they were here. </p>

<p>No indication whether <strong>Myron Floren </strong>played "Wipeout," but the indifferent expressions on the faces of the Welk band speak volumes.</p>

<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/j09C8clJaXo&hl=en"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/j09C8clJaXo&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344"></embed></object><br />
</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>&quot;Lost&quot;: Here&apos;s the Book Club</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://weblogs.newsday.com/entertainment/tv/blog/2008/07/lost_heres_the_book_club.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blogs.trb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=56/entry_id=111441" title="&quot;Lost&quot;: Here's the Book Club" />
    <id>tag:weblogs.newsday.com,2008:/entertainment/tv/blog//56.111441</id>
    
    <published>2008-07-01T20:22:15Z</published>
    <updated>2008-07-01T20:33:19Z</updated>
    
    <summary> Here&apos;s a great idea. Really. ABC.com is launching a &quot;Lost Book Club.&quot; The press release says it all, or most of it, so here ya go: &quot;Do you need a &apos;Lost&apos; fix? Beginning today, ABC.com is launching the &quot;Lost...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Verne Gay</name>
        
    </author>
            <category term="Lost" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://weblogs.newsday.com/entertainment/tv/blog/">
        <![CDATA[<p> <img alt="wallpaper_rainbow_six_vegas_04_1024_.jpg" src="http://weblogs.newsday.com/entertainment/tv/blog/wallpaper_rainbow_six_vegas_04_1024_.jpg" width="380" height="285" /align=right>  Here's a great idea. Really. ABC.com is launching a<strong> "Lost Book Club."</strong> The press release says it all, or most of it, so here ya go: "Do you need a <strong>'Lost' </strong>fix? Beginning today, ABC.com is launching the "Lost Book Club" which will give fans new insight on books that have been either seen or referenced throughout the dynamic four seasons of 'Lost. The book list will be added to regularly on ABC.com, with a list also available for audio download on the <strong>iTunes Store</strong>...Also available on ABC.com will be a message board to discuss the titles, a synopsis of each book, along with when and how it was referenced in the show, and an introduction by <strong>co-creator/executive producer Damon Lindelof and executive producer Carlton Cuse.</strong> Book examples include Sawyer reading 'Watership Down,' Juliet’s book club reading 'Carrie' [during the book club, no less] and an orientation film hidden behind 'The Turn of the Screw.'"</p>

<p>  <img alt="ICONATOR_dade7f68fa9ec8feba4666cc35b4307f.gif" src="http://weblogs.newsday.com/entertainment/tv/blog/ICONATOR_dade7f68fa9ec8feba4666cc35b4307f.gif" width="50" height="50" /align=left> But the challenge is obvious.<a href="http://www.lostpedia.com/wiki/Literature"> Think of all the books on this show</a> - dozens, and thematically, you could say they were not exactly conceived under the same roof. This will be one bizarro book club - fun, interesting, wild, and a little/lot schizoid. How else to describe a book club that will include selections like <strong>Clancy's "Rainbow Six"</strong> (above) and <strong>"The Wizard of Oz?"</strong> </p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Breaking: Vomit Reality Show to Premiere</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://weblogs.newsday.com/entertainment/tv/blog/2008/07/breaking_vomit_reality_show_to.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blogs.trb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=56/entry_id=111374" title="Breaking: Vomit Reality Show to Premiere" />
    <id>tag:weblogs.newsday.com,2008:/entertainment/tv/blog//56.111374</id>
    
    <published>2008-07-01T17:26:11Z</published>
    <updated>2008-07-01T18:01:56Z</updated>
    
    <summary> Just when I think I&apos;ve seen it all, I realize: I haven&apos;t seen it all. There&apos;s much more to see (Spencer &amp; Heidi, in &quot;Hitched,&quot; for example.) Much, much more. On July 15, G4 - the Comcast entertainment web...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Verne Gay</name>
        
    </author>
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://weblogs.newsday.com/entertainment/tv/blog/">
        <![CDATA[<p><img alt="CB022696.jpg" src="http://weblogs.newsday.com/entertainment/tv/blog/CB022696.jpg" width="276" height="400" /align=right> Just when I think I've seen it all, I realize: I haven't seen it all. There's much more to see (<strong>Spencer & Heidi</strong>, in "Hitched," for example.) Much, much more. </p>

<p>   On July 15, G4 -  the<strong> Comcast</strong> entertainment web that's basically designed for the mentally depleted who can't tear themselves away from their vidgames - will debut <strong>"Hurl!" </strong></p>

<p>  The line:  "Brave contestants consume massive portions of all-American favorites and are then strapped into <strong>nausea-inducing contraptions</strong> designed to shake them up. The contestant to hold his or her food down the longest claims victory and walks away with a cash prize and, most importantly, serious bragging rights. Challenge winners with the best time who complete all rounds without hurling at any point, earn the highly coveted and elusive <strong>'Iron Stomach Award</strong>.'”</p>

<p>  "The competition consists of multiple rounds beginning with a speed-eating contest that features popular foods ranging from chicken pot pies to <strong>New England chowder, tuna casserole, hot dogs, blueberry pie and more</strong>. In the second round, contenders that ate the most in Round One move on to a physical challenge designed to cause even the strongest stomachs to rebel, including carnival rides, mechanical bull-riding and Sumo wrestling."</p>

<p>  "In the final round, contestants must sit through the season premiere of <strong>'Hitched,' starring Spencer Pratt and Heidi Montag..."</strong></p>

<p>   [I'm just kidding. This last one isn't really part of the competition. But it should be.]</p>

<p>  One of the comps is called "Balls of Hurl,” whereby "contestants eat as much<strong> Mac & Cheese</strong> as they can, then strap into steel-caged Human Bowling Balls and careen down LA's famous 2nd Street Tunnel.<strong> Pumpkin pie </strong>awaits those who don't blow chunks in the balls… and then it's on to another spin."</p>

<p>  Don't you just love TV?</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>&quot;Mad Men&quot; Walk-on Contest</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://weblogs.newsday.com/entertainment/tv/blog/2008/07/mad_men_walkon_contest.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blogs.trb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=56/entry_id=111362" title="&quot;Mad Men&quot; Walk-on Contest" />
    <id>tag:weblogs.newsday.com,2008:/entertainment/tv/blog//56.111362</id>
    
    <published>2008-07-01T16:33:13Z</published>
    <updated>2008-07-01T21:00:31Z</updated>
    
    <summary> I love these gimmicks - they offer the possibility that I too will one day be as famous as Spencer Pratt, and maybe get my own reality show. But I&apos;m getting ahead of myself. Here&apos;s the deal: AMC is...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Verne Gay</name>
        
    </author>
            <category term="Mad Men" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://weblogs.newsday.com/entertainment/tv/blog/">
        <![CDATA[<p><img alt="madmen-chrishend.jpg" src="http://weblogs.newsday.com/entertainment/tv/blog/madmen-chrishend.jpg" width="333" height="500" /align=right>  I love these gimmicks - they offer the possibility that I too will one day be as famous as <strong>Spencer Pratt</strong>, and maybe get my own reality show. </p>

<p>  But I'm getting ahead of myself. Here's the deal:<strong> AMC is launching a contest</strong> to a.) get more people to watch its break-out hit; and b.) Offer a lucky Pratt wannabe to stand next to <strong>Don Draper</strong> and tell him how to create a new campaign for Clearasil.... The cameo will air in the third season (which I don't believe AMC has even officially announced yet.)</p>

<p>  Details, per AMC: "Just perform pre-selected lines for<strong> Don Draper, Pete Campbell, Roger Sterling, Betty Draper, Peggy Olson or Joan Holloway</strong> and send us your video."  I checked out some of the lines, and they're pretty well-known to "MM" fanatics - like the one after Roger recovers from his heart attack and tells <strong>Joan Holloway</strong> (right) what, ummm, a nice lady she is, and how lucky he is to have, ummmm, known her. Or the time when <strong>Campbell </strong>says he invented direct marketing. </p>

<p>  AMC says <a href="http://blogs.amctv.com/mad-men-contest/submit-video.php">to go here for more details and how to enter, etc.</a></p>

<p>  And...the second season begins July 27. But you already knew that. </p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Spencer and Heidi: The Show?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://weblogs.newsday.com/entertainment/tv/blog/2008/07/spencer_and_heidi_the_show.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blogs.trb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=56/entry_id=111297" title="Spencer and Heidi: The Show?" />
    <id>tag:weblogs.newsday.com,2008:/entertainment/tv/blog//56.111297</id>
    
    <published>2008-07-01T13:44:34Z</published>
    <updated>2008-07-01T20:35:51Z</updated>
    
    <summary> At first, and like everyone else, when I heard the idea, I doubled up in agony, my very soul torn - nay, ripped - by the idea of such a monstrosity. Then, my stomach turned. Then, my head reeled....</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Verne Gay</name>
        
    </author>
            <category term="the Hills" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://weblogs.newsday.com/entertainment/tv/blog/">
        <![CDATA[<p>  <img alt="heidi-spencer.jpg" src="http://weblogs.newsday.com/entertainment/tv/blog/heidi-spencer.jpg" width="386" height="400" /></p>

<p>   At first, and like everyone else, when<strong> I heard the idea</strong>, I doubled up in agony, my very soul torn - nay, ripped - by the idea of such a monstrosity. Then, my stomach turned. Then, my head reeled. Then, I collapsed on the floor, writhing in nausea, wracked by a sense of futility, and plunging into a psychic - nay, existential -  despair so deep and dark that I feared for my very sanity. (And still do.)</p>

<p>  Anyway, this is kinda how I reacted when I first heard the idea of a <strong>Heidi/Spencer reality show. </strong> It would follow these two around after they got married - you know, to stores. It was sort of a <strong>"Nick & Jessica Meet Heidi & Spence and Go Shopping." </strong>It was first reported in early April by the <strong>Keith-Olbermann-loving "Page 6" crew</strong>.</p>

<p> I could see this show in my jaundiced mind's eye, as they went from<strong> Bottega Veneta, to David Orgell, to Dolce & Gabbana, to Louis Vuitton, to Ungaro, to Prada Epicenter, </strong>and finally ended up at <strong>Liz Lange Maternity.</strong></p>

<p> Cut to tight head shot of Spencer, as he's thinking, "could baby make THREE?" </p>

<p> Why ponder this again? Because<strong> USA Today</strong> had the biggest story of the week so far yesterday, and wrote - contrary to popular opinion and all that is holy - that this SHOW IS ACTUALLY GONNA HAPPEN. </p>

<p>  Here are outtakes, in case you missed this, as I did, until just a few minutes ago: </p>

<p> "This August, she and Pratt are headed to Africa to 'feed children and help build things,' [says Heidi.] Cameras will capture their trek, but not for 'The Hills.' Pratt says it's possible they could adopt a baby while over there, but Montag laughs that idea off.</p>

<p> "'Not right now,' she insists. 'I think we'd be married before we do that.'"</p>

<p>  [<strong>Translation:</strong> They're not gonna spoil that money shot of Spencer reax at Liz Lange.] </p>

<p>  Now, here's the rest. </p>

<p> "<strong>Montag and Pratt</strong> will wrap up their time on 'The Hills' after this season and launch their own MTV reality series along the lines of Newlyweds: Nick & Jessica — Montag's all-time favorite show.</p>

<p> "Any concern such constant camera presence could lead her and Pratt down the same doomed path as the since-divorced Lachey and Simpson?</p>

<p> "'I don't really feel that way,' she says. 'You're either going to make it as a couple or you're not. I love cameras, but the cameras aren't with us when we're falling asleep at night.'"</p>

<p>   It's OK. I'm feeling much better now. Thanks for your concern. After I get off the phone with <strong>my shrink</strong> to get a re-fill, I'll get right over to my friends at MTV to ask the obvious questions. </p>

<p><img alt="heidi_montag.jpg" src="http://weblogs.newsday.com/entertainment/tv/blog/heidi_montag.jpg" width="300" height="400" /align=left><strong> "Hi everyone. It's me! And Heidi! We're getting married. And we're going to have our own TV show. And you're going to watch because you can't help yourself! And we don't care about cynics, and miserable critics - those sad lifeless creeps who can't afford even a toothpick at Dolce's. We're in love, and we're going to Africa and we're maybe going to adopt a baby and run into Brangelina. Cameras will follow us. We'll be even more famous. Did I say - we're in love? Well, we are." Picture: People Mag.  </strong><br />
</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Producers: We&apos;re in a &quot;De Facto Strike&quot;</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://weblogs.newsday.com/entertainment/tv/blog/2008/07/producers_were_in_a_de_facto_s.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blogs.trb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=56/entry_id=111278" title="Producers: We're in a &quot;De Facto Strike&quot;" />
    <id>tag:weblogs.newsday.com,2008:/entertainment/tv/blog//56.111278</id>
    
    <published>2008-07-01T12:12:20Z</published>
    <updated>2008-07-01T12:47:00Z</updated>
    
    <summary> Will &quot;House&quot; be shut? Will &quot;Lost&quot; get lost? Will the lights dim on &quot;FNL?&quot; Gulp. What&apos;s a &quot;de facto strike?&quot; Is it like being half pregnant, or halfway to being half pregnant, or WHAT? In any event, the negotiating...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Verne Gay</name>
        
    </author>
            <category term="screen actors guild" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://weblogs.newsday.com/entertainment/tv/blog/">
        <![CDATA[<p> <img alt="house-MD-fox-television-thumb.jpg" src="http://weblogs.newsday.com/entertainment/tv/blog/house-MD-fox-television-thumb.jpg" width="450" height="336" /><br />
<strong> Will "House" be shut? Will "Lost" get lost? Will the lights dim on "FNL?"</strong> </p>

<p></p>

<p></p>

<p> Gulp. What's <strong>a "de facto strike?"</strong> Is it like being half pregnant, or halfway to being half pregnant, or WHAT?</p>

<p>  In any event, the negotiating arm of the studios -<strong> the AMPTP</strong> - last night released this statement, saying the industry was now in this half-way strike, just as the contract for SAG came to an end at midnight. It also said it had given the actors ifs final and best offer - which, interestingly and hardly surprisingly, was probably identical to the one the writers got last winter. </p>

<p>   De Facto strike? This is what I think it means: That until actors agree to a deal, production will slowly and inexorably wind down,<strong> like some sort of giant clock</strong>, until... In other words, the AMPTP said last night - in effect - that no new production will take place until they've got a deal. This is a heck of a lot better than a studio lock-out, which was a remote possibility, but still chilling. </p>

<p>  Also: While this is probably bad for movie production, <strong>it's less problematic for TV</strong> because series have remained in production since the writers' strike ended. They've done this not simply to fill the empty vault but in the possibility (likelihood) that this day would come. In other words, they can complete their orders, which means a full season of serial television in 2008-09.</p>

<p>  Here's part of the statement: "Our industry is now in a de facto strike, with film production virtually shut down and television production now seriously threatened.  In an effort to put everyone back to work, the AMPTP today presented SAG our final offer - a comprehensive proposal worth more than $250 million in additional compensation to SAG members, with significant economic gains and groundbreaking new media rights for all performers.</p>

<p> "Our $250 million offer is consistent with the four other labor agreements already reached this year with DGA, WGA, AFTRA Network Code and AFTRA Prime-Time Exhibit A.  In addition, our offer addresses issues that SAG identified as being of utmost concern to its members, including tailoring our new media framework for SAG in areas such as feature films and significant gains for working actors."</p>

<p>   Here's a bit of what SAG had to say: </p>

<p>   "The<strong> AMPTP today delivered a last-minute</strong>, 43-page offer that upon initial examination appears to be generally consistent with the AFTRA deal, particularly in its provisions relating to new media. The union is reviewing the complex package and will prepare a response to management once that analysis is complete."</p>

<p>  In other words, lets keep talking.</p>

<p>   So, will there be a deal? Will there be an actors' strike? Yes, to the first question, no to the second. Again, SAG is waiting for results of the AFTRA vote, due early next week. If that deal passes - expected - then SAG will probably eventually accept this one too. </p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>&apos;SNL&apos; : The Five Things I Learned</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://weblogs.newsday.com/entertainment/tv/blog/2008/06/snl_no_1_5_things_i_learned.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blogs.trb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=56/entry_id=111208" title="'SNL' : The Five Things I Learned" />
    <id>tag:weblogs.newsday.com,2008:/entertainment/tv/blog//56.111208</id>
    
    <published>2008-06-30T20:43:56Z</published>
    <updated>2008-07-01T12:38:59Z</updated>
    
    <summary> Here are the five things I learned from watching the very first episode of &quot;Saturday Night Live,&quot; which NBC aired this weekend as a tribute to the show&apos;s host, George Carlin. 1. John Belushi played a character who lived...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Andy Edelstein</name>
        
    </author>
            <category term="Andy Edelstein" />
            <category term="saturday night live" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://weblogs.newsday.com/entertainment/tv/blog/">
        <![CDATA[<p><img alt="snl.two0220_big" src="http://weblogs.newsday.com/entertainment/tv/blog/snl.two0220_big" width="440" height="600"></p>

<p>Here are the five things I learned from watching the very first episode of <strong>"Saturday Night Live," </strong>which NBC aired this weekend as a tribute to the show's host, George Carlin.</p>

<p><strong>1.</strong> John Belushi played a character who lived in Mattituck in a semi-funny skit about a TV show called "Victims of Shark Bites" (isn't that show on NBC's fall schedule for this September?)</p>

<p><strong>2.</strong> During a filmed segment called "Show Us Your Guns," the camera briefly panned to a gas station where a gallon cost... 67 cents! And I remember being really annoyed back then that gas could get so high.</p>

<p><strong>3.</strong> The very first Bee segment, "Bee Hospital," may have been historic, but it wasn't all that funny.</p>

<p><strong>4.</strong> Too many of these people are no longer with us: Carlin, Belushi, Gilda Radner, guest singer Billy Preston, writer Michael O'Donoghue, guest Andy Kaufman.</p>

<p><strong>5.</strong> Announcer Don Pardo, however may be 112, but he's still with us. And he really did call the show's ensemble The Not For Ready Primetime Players.</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Forget Olympics: &quot;Office Games&quot; in Scranton</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://weblogs.newsday.com/entertainment/tv/blog/2008/06/forget_olympics_office_games_i.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blogs.trb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=56/entry_id=111179" title="Forget Olympics: &quot;Office Games&quot; in Scranton" />
    <id>tag:weblogs.newsday.com,2008:/entertainment/tv/blog//56.111179</id>
    
    <published>2008-06-30T18:50:10Z</published>
    <updated>2008-06-30T19:28:02Z</updated>
    
    <summary> This may be huge news in Scranton, but it&apos;s news to me: &quot;The Office Games&quot; will take in the queen city of the Lackawanna valley on July 19. It&apos;s billed as a &quot;full day of Dunder Mifflin style fun,&quot;...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Verne Gay</name>
        
    </author>
            <category term="The Office" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://weblogs.newsday.com/entertainment/tv/blog/">
        <![CDATA[<p><img alt="kellykapoordbacks-729054.jpg" src="http://weblogs.newsday.com/entertainment/tv/blog/kellykapoordbacks-729054.jpg" width="300" height="400" /align=right><br />
This may be huge news in<strong> Scranton</strong>, but it's news to me: "The Office Games" will take in the queen city of the Lackawanna valley on July 19. It's billed as a "full day of Dunder Mifflin style fun," and will be hosted by <strong>Kelly Kapoor</strong>,  otherwise known as someone named<strong> Mindy Kaling</strong>. </p>

<p> Now, if this all sounds suspiciously (to you) like a publicity stunt to advertise a new "Office" board and DVD game, then your suspicion is well-founded. </p>

<p>  Here's the full-day  sched: </p>

<p>9:00 a.m. – 2K Fun Run [Wear your favorite office attire! Prizes for best dressed, best character look-a-likes and fastest.]</p>

<p>10:30 a.m. – "The Office" Trivia Challenge [Are you an "Assistant to the Regional Manager" or the "Regional Manager" when it comes to "The Office" trivia?  The Challenge will feature questions from "The Office" Trivia Game.]</p>

<p>12:00 p.m. – Beet Eating Contest  [Straight from Dwight's farm...well, after being canned.]  <br />
 <br />
1:30 p.m. – 2:30 p.m. – Autograph Session  [The first 125 customers who purchase "The Office" DVD Board Game or "The Office" Trivia Game at Boscov's at The Mall at Steamtown in Scranton, PA, on July 19 will be able meet Mindy Kaling and have her autograph their game.]<br />
   <br />
<strong> In a canned quote,</strong> Kelly said: "I have been to Scranton before and am really excited to return for this fun event!"</p>

<p><img alt="amyryan_50.jpg" src="http://weblogs.newsday.com/entertainment/tv/blog/amyryan_50.jpg" width="50" height="50" /align=right> And...in "Office" casting news: NBC did just now formally confirm a batch of trade reports this ayem, that<strong> Amy Ryan</strong> will be back in season 5 to reprise her <strong>Holly Flax</strong> role. She'll be on board for "multiple" episodes. Is this a surprise? Hardly! She was great and the last we saw of her, she was driving off with<strong> Kevin</strong>, whom she believed to be retarded...</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>&quot;HSM: Get in the Picture&quot; at Jones, Robert Moses</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://weblogs.newsday.com/entertainment/tv/blog/2008/06/hsm_get_in_the_picture_at_jone.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blogs.trb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=56/entry_id=111150" title="&quot;HSM: Get in the Picture&quot; at Jones, Robert Moses" />
    <id>tag:weblogs.newsday.com,2008:/entertainment/tv/blog//56.111150</id>
    
    <published>2008-06-30T17:18:35Z</published>
    <updated>2008-06-30T17:32:26Z</updated>
    
    <summary> You heard about this spin-off/another-surefire-way-to-exploit-&quot;HSM&quot; reality show based on &quot;High School Musical?&quot; It&apos;s called “High School Musical: Get in the Picture.” Hosted by Nick Lachey, it&apos;s one of those comp series that&apos;s looking for the country&apos;s most talented teens,...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Verne Gay</name>
        
    </author>
            <category term="High School Musical" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://weblogs.newsday.com/entertainment/tv/blog/">
        <![CDATA[<p> <img alt="39388489.jpg" src="http://weblogs.newsday.com/entertainment/tv/blog/39388489.jpg" width="500" height="331" /></p>

<p>  You heard about this spin-off/another-surefire-way-to-exploit-"HSM" reality show based on "High School Musical?" It's called<strong> “High School Musical: Get in the Picture.”</strong>  Hosted by<strong> Nick Lachey</strong>, it's one of those comp series that's looking for the country's most talented teens, etc. Winner won't necessarily get a spot in "HSM III" or "IV" but they will get noticed and get noticed on primetime tv; bows July 20. </p>

<p>   In any event, the show will be at <strong>Jones Beach </strong>on July 5, this Saturday, and Sunday at<strong> Robert Moses.</strong> Bring your talent and bring your sunscreen. </p>

<p>  Press release details: The show will go to to "beaches on both coasts with branded ice cream trucks offering games and prizes. Beach goers will be able to cool off with free ice cream at East and West Coast locations over the 4th of July weekend and on additional dates leading up to the premiere of the show.  </p>

<p> "In addition, visitors can win prizes including Kmart gift cards, t-shirts, DVDs and soundtracks, and participate in various games and events, including karaoke, a trivia wheel and a green screen photo booth -- so you can literally 'Get in the Picture' of 'High School Musical.'”</p>

<p>  It'll be at parking lot 4 at JB, and Field 5 at RMB.</p>

<p><strong>(Photo: Oooooh! It's Nick...yoohoo, NICK, over here!!! Pix by Gerardo Mora / Getty Images.)</strong><br />
</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

</feed> 

