« Old School Tuesday: Yo! MTV Raps | Main | Secret agent Ryan Seacrest »

The Pet Rock Movie Rating System

Really, what’s the difference between a movie that gets two stars and one that gets two-and-a-half stars? Is that extra half-star going to force you off the couch and into a theater seat?

We doubt it.

Movie trailers are accessible on hundreds of Web sites, as is the ability for readers to rate and review movies. By the time a movie review runs in the newspaper on opening weekend, there has already been tons of information digested online. The question we pose is whether or not the four-star rating system is still valid for readers, regardless of medium.

With sites such as rottentomatoes.com which aggregates movie reviews from across the country, a reader can read dozens of reviews on each movie. Google and other search engines provide a similar service.

So how is a reader to really know how good a movie is when a New York newspaper gives it three stars, a Florida paper gives it two stars, a Texas paper two-and-a-half stars and a California paper gives it one star? Does a reader trust its local reviewer or the one closest to Hollywood and presumably more plugged in to the industry?

Instead of stars, what if movie reviews advised people on what they should do for each movie? It would certainly increase the utility of movie reviews. The guess here is that traditional media outlets will never do this. Magazines such as Entertainment Weekly use a grading system, but again, what’s the real difference between a B and B+? (In this country, C students can become president of a country and A students can’t even find a job.) But here in Pet Rock, we thrive on challenging the norm.

As such, we present the Pet Rock Movie Rating System. Right now, you may scoff at this idea, but one day in the future, we’ll be looked at brilliant visionaries. We'll base all our movie opinions here using this system, starting Wednesday afternoon with "The Hammer."

See in theaters

Translation: It’s worth spending money, be it yours or someone else’s, to sit in a dark room with strangers and be entertained by the moving pictures on the big screen. It’s up to you whether or not that means a matinee or prime-time showing.

Wait for the DVD

Translation: This movie is worth seeing but don’t rush to a theater to for it. If you can’t make it to a showing during its theatrical run, just add it to your Netflix list or rent it from Blockbuster. There’s no harm in being in this category aside from financial for the studio and production company.

Wait for cable

Translation: A simple push of the REC button on your DVR or TiVo remote is all the effort you should put forth to watch this movie. Basically, if you watch this movie, you won’t be mad at yourself, but if you spend drop any amount of Benjamins besides the cost of electricity in your house, you will be mad at yourself.

Don’t waste your time

Translation: Keep your money in your pocket. Cancel your Netflix account if this movie shows up on their recommendation list. Boycott the cable or broadcast network that airs this thing they called a movie.

- Mark La Monica

Comments (5)

That's the system my friends and I use - much simpler. Although, we often try to avoid reading critic's reviews and going in to movies with an unbiased opinion. After all, you might not like what I like, and vice versa - take critic's reviews with a grain of salt in the end...

Glad we're on the same wavelength, Lauren.

Go see Juno before it leaves the theaters. I'm just sayin.

i have a system use with my friends. there are no half stars in our movie rating system and the lowest rating is 1 star. it goes as follows:
4 stars = the movie is so good that right after i saw it i will watch it again in theater, and i will own it on dvd the second it comes out.
3 stars = it was worth watching and i will see it again when it comes on dvd but i won't own it on dvd.
2 stars = it was worth watching but i will not see again in theater nor on dvd. it is the kind of movie that you see because other people saw it.
1 star = this movie was not worth watching it was completely junk and was a complete waste of money. when you went in to see the movie it should have come with a gun to kill yourself while watching the lame excuse for a movie. this movie should have asign that reads "you're better off jumping off a cliff".
if newsday ues this system i think it will be helpfull. i will give examples of each:
4 star movies are: the punisher with thomas jane, bad boys 1and2, men in black 1&2, the bourne films
3 star movies = road trip, the tuxedo.
2 stars = all about the benjamins, (i cant think of others right now
)
1 star = the butterfly effect, open water, darkness- boy did this stink. when the movie ended a guy said " what a waist of money" and we all laughed in agreement.. there are alot of these movies in all the genres. watch out for them . maybe i'll make a list and add them here in the future so whoever reads this can get an idea of what i'm talking about
good luck!

Is it a coincidence that this advocacy piece for mindless movie reviewing is posted just as Newsday eliminates their film critics? Readers deserve intelligent and well-written movie reviews. Hopefully they will keep getting that in Newsday.

Pretty much what I do for films anyway. I often read reviews of a feature with an actor/actress I approve of, and if the flick gets a curious review ("The plotting was bad, but X is worth watching"), it become a future rental.

Meantime, I see a lot of thumbs down reviews for "The Love Guru". Indicating it should have gone direct to DVD.

Some summer blockbusters I often disregard the reviewers commentary. I mean BETTER OFF DEAD was given the "two thumbs" down review from Ebert and Siskell. They both hated it with bile dripping from their mouths. It's one of my favorite films, and is regarded as a classic.

The whole idea is good, but everyone does what they want.

Post a comment


Please enter the security code you see here

Video